Posted on 02/06/2005 5:26:49 PM PST by ken21
he's been at this most of his life.
i'm tending to rush's argument:
that he's of more use to us in his teaching job at cu-boulder.
he's on display for all to see.
fine. you insult others when you arrive late and assume you know something we don't already know.
Snapple, the "democratic left in America" (read: Neo-Stalinists) have EVERYTHING in common with Ward Churchill.
Professor Churchill is the Pig.
Listen, you probably don't know this, but Ward Churchill -- who claims to be an Indian -- isn't!
I know you weren't aware of this, so I wanted to educate you.
You can thank me for my teaching, later.
i agree with your neo-stalinism.
but explain this curiosity: several days ago a lawyer and professor at the university of colorado wrote an article, posted on fr, attacking churchill for being a "fascist"!
isn't that choice?
are the communist faculty trying to divorce themselves from churchill by calling him a fascist?
That is why the univesity seems to be on a mission to dump this cretin.
DO try to keep up, though. It's tiring to need to educate you about this man!
Do you know what the statistics are on the grades Churchill actually gives. I'm willing to bet that the average grade is an A-.
yeah, that's what you said yesterday.
it's probably the truth. they need all the cannon fodder they can get, to spread their hate widely.
Quote from the article:
".......Churchill does not advocate a shift from pacifism (especially if practiced in the purest form) to some kind of 'culture of violence'. He is merely suggesting that left-wing and/or anti-imperialist movements should feel free to keep all options open, from rallies and petitions to armed self-defence to armed struggle and that this should be accepted by those who are not directly involved but who support the oppressed.......".
So let me get this straight, he doesn't support violence except where he deems violence is necessary to accomplish his philosophical goals.
Huh?
Weasel words.
The thing is, it should be easy enough to discover. Those kinds of statistics should be public knowledge.
but grades are not.
one time i inquired of a university, and indeed the information is in the public domain, but getting to it is another matter:
they would give me the raw data on a computer tape and written in a social sciences software language!
so, you can get it, if you want it, and can interpret it.
I understand that individual grades cannot be public, but course averages ought to be. Evaluations of professors by students are public.
FOFLOL!
I'm on these WC threads for a reason...gathering and saving the facts. You just happen to go on them to repeat the same,sad statement.
Thanks for you incivility and superciliousness.
Please cite any evidence you have that Ward was a Ranger in Vietnam.
i've never posted to churchill's alleged military experience.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.