Churchill, some politically-correct professor who would bristle at the thought of being associated with apartheid, nonetheless uses apartheid-like reasoning to devalue the humanness of September 11’s dead.
So, according to Churchill, if someone worked in New York’s World Trade Center, it made them a "little Eichmann." Were the 500 foreign nationals from 91 countries who were incinerated on 9/11/01 “little Eichmanns?" How about the Dominican and Irish food service workers? What about the Jewish network technicians? How about the Muslim accountants? The Anglo-Saxon, Jewish, Presbyterian, Pakistani, Japanese, and Latino stock brokers? Were the brave firemen and policemen who sacrificed their lives to save others on 9/11 "Nazis?" What about the people who cleaned the toilets at the WTC? They were "Nazis?" The secretaries? The African-Americans?
I would ask Professor Churchill to please explain how 9/11 victims are categorized as sub-human "little Eichmanns." If a person is 1/8 stock broker, is he or she automatically marked for skyscraper death by jumbo-jet? South Africa’s apartheid laws had similar inanities that, while absolutely absurd, still held sway over a person’s life or death. How is Churchill’s current belief system different than Hitler’s, whom he criticizes? Hitler wanted to kill all the Jews, gays, and gypsies. Yet Churchill sees “justice” in Osama Bin Laden’s plan to rid the world of Jews, Christians, and Shiites.
Thankyou,
There are no words to describe- this man is just a waste of a human being.
By that profs definition yes.