Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld Blasts Russert for Edited Report
NewsMax ^ | 2/6/05 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 02/06/2005 12:25:07 PM PST by wagglebee

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld blasted NBC's "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert on Sunday for selectively editing an exchange he had in December with a National Guardsman who complained that his unit's vehicles weren't armored.

"That was unfair and it was selectively taking out two sentences from a long exchange," the Pentagon chief complained. "And when you suggested that that's how I answered that question, that is factually wrong." Russert had just aired a clip of the now infamous exchange between his guest and National Guardsman Specialist Thomas Wilson, where Wilson asked during a town hall meeting in Kuwait why "we soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass to up-armor our vehicles?"

In footage aired by Russert, Rumsfeld replied: "As you know, you go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time.

"And if you think about it, you can have all the armor in the world on a tank and a tank can be blown up. And you can have an up-armored Humvee and it can be blown up."

After the clip had ended, the irked Defense Secretary said, "That is not how I answered that question.

"But, Mr. Secretary," replied Russert somewhat sheepishly. "It clearly represents the exchange and . . . "

"It does not," Rumsfeld shot back.

Prepared with a full transcript, the Defense chief overode the NBC host and proceeded to read his full answer:

"I talked to the general coming out here about the pace at which the vehicles are being armored," Rumsfeld began in response to Wilson.

"They have been brought from all over the world, wherever they're not needed, to places where they are needed. I'm told they are being--the Army is--I think it's something like 400 a month are being done now.

"And it's essentially a matter of physics. It's not a matter of money. It isn't a matter on the part of the Army's desire. It's a matter of production and capability of doing it. As you know, you go to the war with the Army you have. They're not the Army you might want or wish to have at a later time.

"Since the Iraq conflict began, the Army has been pressing ahead to produce armor necessary at a rate that they believe--it's a greatly expanded rate from what existed previously but a rate that they believe is the rate that can be accomplished.

"I can assure you that General Schumacher and the leadership of the Army and certainly General Whitcomb are sensitive to the fact that not every vehicle has the degree of armor that would be desirable to have, but that they're working at it at a good clip.

"It's interesting. I've talked a great deal about this with a team of people who've been working hard at the Pentagon. And if you think about it, you can have all the armor in the world on a tank and the tank could still be blown up. And you can have an up-armored Humvee and it can be blown up.

"And you can go down and the vehicle--the goal we have is to have many of those vehicles as is humanly possible with the appropriate level of armor available for the troops. And that's what the Army's been working on." [END OF RUMSFELD'S ANSWER TO WILSON].

After finishing the transcript, the defense chief told Russert:

"Now, that answer is totally different from picking out two lines. And I think it's an unfair representation and it's exactly what some of the newspapers around the country did."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armor; leftistpress; mediabias; mtp; nbcnews; rumsfeld; rusmfeld; russert; timrussert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
Go Rummy!
1 posted on 02/06/2005 12:25:07 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Russert should stick to interviewing stupid people.

It works out better that way.

2 posted on 02/06/2005 12:26:39 PM PST by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
That was an absolutely beautiful spanking of the lying, fundamentally dishonest shill Russert! I LOVED it! :)
3 posted on 02/06/2005 12:26:50 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Wow! I'm sorry I missed it! Go Rummy!


4 posted on 02/06/2005 12:28:06 PM PST by PilloryHillary (Yes, I was JohnFKerrySucks, but it's time to move on. Pillory Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
He cleaned Russert's clock and would not be interrupted once he started reading the transcript. Rummy was on his game in this morning's interview.
5 posted on 02/06/2005 12:28:40 PM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Rummy out on the talk show circuit playing "wack-a-mole" :D
6 posted on 02/06/2005 12:30:20 PM PST by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Beautiful!!!


7 posted on 02/06/2005 12:30:22 PM PST by JesseJane (KERRY: I have had conversations with leaders, yes, recently.That's not your business, it's mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I watched it. A thing of great beauty. I have never seen Russert put down as well as Rummy did today. A landmark in TV news as far as I'm concerned. God Bless Donald Rumsfeld.


8 posted on 02/06/2005 12:30:40 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Did Russert get that look on his face like a big St Bernard who got crapping in the middle of the new carpet?


9 posted on 02/06/2005 12:30:52 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I saw this IT WAS GREAT!! Rummy CALLED Russert OUT BIG TIME!!!


10 posted on 02/06/2005 12:32:15 PM PST by cody32127 (If Democrats are not evil, then evil has no meaning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilloryHillary

Ditto


11 posted on 02/06/2005 12:33:36 PM PST by tiredoflaundry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Rumsfeld needs to ask Mr. Russert how many armored humvees the terrorists have. How many tanks, how many fighter planes, how many warships, how many laser guided bombs, how many moabs, how many nukes...


12 posted on 02/06/2005 12:33:40 PM PST by Rad_J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I love that guy.


13 posted on 02/06/2005 12:34:01 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Too bad this (complete) exchange was not FRONT page above the fold news !!


14 posted on 02/06/2005 12:34:50 PM PST by genefromjersey (So much to flame;so little time !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rad_J

Rummy / Rice in '08


15 posted on 02/06/2005 12:34:56 PM PST by spokeshave (Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
=

16 posted on 02/06/2005 12:35:59 PM PST by Straight Vermonter (Liberalism: The irrational fear of self reliance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

And that is why President Bush did not accept his resignation twice. And that is why we civilians love Rummy, Secretary of Defense.

Who would have thought that the American people need a Secretary of Defense to protect them for MSM? Who would have thunk?


17 posted on 02/06/2005 12:36:40 PM PST by Chgogal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I missed this but it's so rich I looked up "Meet the Press" on tvguide.com so I can watch it.

I saw some of Stephanopolous' interview of Rumsfeld this AM and couldn't help but chuckle at how the wise elder man refused to get entrapped by the youngster appearing to look for all the world like he was asking questions that needed answering.


18 posted on 02/06/2005 12:37:41 PM PST by GretchenM (Mrs. Gregoire, U-Haul is waiting eagerly for your call.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilloryHillary

It could be re aired on MSNBC. It is here tonight..9 or 10. You can skip the last part..It's Teddy...I did.


19 posted on 02/06/2005 12:37:52 PM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Yo, Timmy. Who's your Daddy?


20 posted on 02/06/2005 12:38:13 PM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson