Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Txsleuth

The same "specially marked" license has been touted by Arnold in Calif. I guess they think it will somehow track people.


I'm with you, not much changing with this legislation. How can the OBL be so opposed. But they haven't said much one way or the other about Sensenbrenner's bill. I just don't know anymore.


46 posted on 02/06/2005 4:56:48 PM PST by JustAnotherSavage ("We are all sinners. But jerks revel in their sins." PJ O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: JustAnotherSavage

Another question---

I read that the reason that the fence hasn't been completed in California is because of the presence of some birds and that the fence would bother their nesting place or something--correct?

If Sensenbrenner is going to the trouble to put the finishing of the fence in this bill---even though there are a bunch of people against it, then WHY aren't there fences going along the rest of the border?

I guarantee you that the people that live along the borders in Arizona and New Mexico and Texas would looooooooove to have fences put up, I dare say they would even hire some "illegals" to help put them up--I would add a laugh sign here, but I don't think I am that far off!!!

He is also having to correct decisions made by the 9th circuit in this bill---why don't they just get rid of the 9th circuit or something---

I'm sorry if I am not making sense--I just think that this bill is gonna cause a lot of debate and waste a lot of time, and I don't see enough problems solved--


47 posted on 02/06/2005 5:20:56 PM PST by Txsleuth (Proud to be a Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson