Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lancey Howard

Yeah. Did you tell yourself that when they defended Ollie North? Or was that a little nonsense case, too?

Or when it filed a brief on behalf of Rush Limbaugh?


13 posted on 02/06/2005 9:00:11 AM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Publius Valerius

Don't forget that they like to "defend" Illinois Nazis, too. (I hate Illinois Nazis.)

The athiests of the ACLU and their enablers in your scumbag Democrat Party are at war with traditional America and its values. Occasionally, they take a side which they silently abhor just so that they can feign impartiality. You might fall for their transparent con job, but I don't.

Let me know the next time the ACLU vigorously defends the First Amendment's right to free exercise of religion, okay Bunky? Or the next time they vigorously defend the Second Amendment.


25 posted on 02/06/2005 10:05:04 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Publius Valerius
You have a point....

But I'd wager that the ACLU weighs the pros and cons of every case they take...and doubly so, when it's seemingly a conservative cause.

I can't factually present any evidence here....but I'd gather/guess the "perceived" & "potential" value is duly measured....

FWIW-

45 posted on 02/06/2005 2:18:43 PM PST by Osage Orange (Why does John McCain always look as confused as a goat on Astroturf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson