Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCRoberts
If this article is correct, the police didn't suspect him. They just took him in for questioning...do the police you need probable cause to do ordinary police work like questioning people ?

If the person being questioned blurts out that he was there when the murders were committed, what are the police suppose to do ?
12 posted on 02/06/2005 8:19:10 AM PST by stylin19a (Marines - end of discussion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a
They just took him in for questioning...

Well, I haven't read the opinion, but there's your problem right there! The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause--the police just can't go around detaining people willy-nilly.

The police take him into the station, that's a seizure, and you need probable cause for that.

14 posted on 02/06/2005 8:35:44 AM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: stylin19a
***If the person being questioned blurts out that he was there when the murders were committed, what are the police suppose to do?***

They're supposed to cover their ears and go ... LA-LA-LA-LA, I didn't hear you - then drive him home.

/IDIOT JUDGES & criminal rights BS sarcasm - derision: OFF

17 posted on 02/06/2005 8:51:35 AM PST by Condor51 (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Gen G Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson