Gloria Feldt's delusional rant

World Net Daily ^ | February 5, 2005 | David N. Bass

[ViLaLuz]

Delusional is an understatement. Watch Planned Parenthood's public image become more "moderate" in the coming years.

[SirLurkedalot]

Even Satan can disguise himself as an angel of light. Let's skip 'moderate' and get to the 'ash heap' part.

[starfish923]

Does that make Ms. Feldt a mass murderer?

[Grant Ellis]

That'll never happen. These people are anarchists at heart. Godless champions of illogic and underachievement. Not only will they not go away, but with the onset of Dean, watch them become even more shrill. Their number may decrease as the less radical drift toward sanity but be certain they are not going away.

[Liz]

Hillary slowly slithers to the right.

The question is ---in light of the resounding 2004 Values Voters Victories---how "conservative" will Hillary get?

Clinton recently proposed moderating the Democrats' position on abortion (snicker).

OTHER UPCOMING HILLARY REVISIONISMS: "I hate men who cheat on their wives" "Vast right wing conspiracy? What Vast right wing conspiracy" "Baking cookies is my fave after-work activity"

Hillary's mighty busy with her Campaign 2008 Extreme Makeover. She's got four years to make people believe she's Mother Teresa.

Let's see. After she opens a charge at Wal-Mart, enrolls in Divinity School, and gets a lifetime membership in the John Birch Society, she'll need to get a shopper's card at Sam's Club, and schedule daily morning prayer services in her Senate office.

And just to cover all bases, Bill will take an anti-adultery pledge in the vestibule of the National Cathedral, when Hillary takes her minister's vows.

Oh, and Hillary will campaign wearing the official DNC apron, and give cookie-baking demonstrations while on the stump, and pose with an aresenal of firearms while engaged in target practice.

[ishabibble]

I am seriously concerned about the Clinton's master plan.

Bill is cozying up to the Bush White House; leave it to him to ride the tsunami wave in to being a "presence" again.

Hillary is going to use the next four years to make people forget who she really is, and why there is very good reason to fear this vile creature.

Rule of Thumb: Bill is bad, but Hillary is evil.

[yeetch!]

Odd, but it has the ring of truth!

[watchin]

Well, if she didn't actually perform the abortions, then no, at least no more so than Hitler.

[ViLaLuz]

I hope you are correct, but don't you think that Feldt stepping down is an attempt to take the shrill glare off the image shell surrounding that anarchistic core?

[ViLaLuz]

"Even Satan can disguise himself as an angel of light."

Even Hillary can disguise herself as an angel of light. Let's hope her political career ends up on the ash heap as well.

[ViLaLuz]

EXACTLY! And in addition to the Democrats' task will be to recreate the images of related liberal groups such as Planned Parenthood so that they appear more moderate and more digestable to the masses.

[SirLurkedalot]

LOL Raising my coffee cup to toast that!

[Liz]

It's all downhill from here for Dums.

[xJones]

Hillary slowly slithers to the right

'Slithers' is exactly the right verb.

Hillary is going to use the next four years to make people forget who she really is, and why there is very good reason to fear this vile creature.

That's right, and I'll bet a lot of liberals don't jump all over her because they know her game and the object is regaining the Presidency. It's really insidious to try to disguise life-long core beliefs in a ruse to fool the perceived dumb masses into voting for her.

[xJones]

#13: That's great, I hadn't seen that before.:)

[Liz]

We must start educating Americans to the savagery of legal abortion. One huge misconception about Roe v Wade: most people believe that the court decision was based on the viability of unborn life, and that the court examined all of the existing information, then decided there was no viability, so abortion should be legal.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

I have had to force newspaper editors to retract editiorials on this aspect of the USSC decision.

The court based its decision on the fact that since religion and science could not decide (up to that time) when life begins, they didn't have to, either.

Roe author Justuce Harry Blackmun wrote: "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."

It appears the Roe Court (or some of them) actually believed that it wasn't possible to determine when the life of a human being begins. But, by not resolving this factual issue, the Court left unresolved the legal question regarding the rights of an unborn child. So, the need to provide an answer to that question is inescapable.

Cutting edge millenium technology offers proof positive that life begins at conception. The issue of when life begins is no longer a difficult question. Scientific and medical evidence proves, without doubt, that human life begins at the moment of conception and that the child is a complete, separate, unique and irreplaceable human being from the moment of conception throughout gestation.

Since 1973, advances in technology have allowed us to obtain new information about human life on a molecular level. This information resolves all doubts that abortion is the act of killing a human being and that this tiny human experiences pain even during early gestation.

At the time of the Roe v Wade decision, abortion was completely illegal in 33 states except when necessary to save the life of the mother. The remaining 17 states allowed abortion in various circumstances. The most permissive, New York, allowed abortion for any reason up to 24 weeks, though New York did not allow third trimester abortions for "emotional health" as required by the Supreme Court.

In recent years, the abortion right has been extended to partial-birth abortions (sometimes termed infanticide) so that a perfectly viable child in the birth canal, in the process of being born, can be aborted in a most gruesome way, if the mother so chooses.

FemiiNazi idealogy is famously written into the USSC decision.

Thanks to FemiNazis, the unborn child has literally no protection in the womb, and is considered fair game by any and all saline/suction-wielding abortionists.

FemiNazis made sure that Roe v Wade made the "Right to Choose" paramount. The mother's rights over the womb are absolute.....up to and including the ninth month of pregnancy.

Another wrongheaded aspect of Roe v Wade might be remedied with legislation by the Congress certifying that the unborn are "persons."

The USSC decision specfically states that under the equal protection clause of 14th Amendment, the unborn child is not considered a "person" and therefore has no legal rights under US law (14th Excerpt: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof......").

Roe v Wade author Justice Blackmun wrote that "the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense" and are not entitled to constitutional protection until birth.

Here, Blackmun was informed by tenets of the Jewish faith, and other faiths, who teach that life begins at birth, not in the womb.

However, the official right-to-life position is that life begins at conception.

Pro aborts insist that US laws built on religious beliefs infringe on their constitutional right of freedom from religion, yet they rarely if ever mention that the Roe v Wade concept of life beginning at birth is a religious belief.

Ironically, a decision that was intended to wash religious beliefs from the law of the land is, in fact, based on someone's religious belief.

[Liz]

ping

[Fenris6]

"I have great respect for John Kerry, but there's no question he did not articulate [abortion] issues well, Fedlt told The Associated Press.

Kerry's off windsurfing, so I'll articulate for him:

Pro-choice: Will Kill for Sex

[Just mythoughts]

Got to wonder who liberals expect to keep their Social Security program paying out. I expect Hillry to use the southern invasion as political taking points to fill the void.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

From:

Gloria's Blog
The Latest
January 25, 2005
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal/files/portal/webzine/globlog/main.xml

"While most Americans acknowledged gratefully the 32nd birthday of Roe v. Wade this Saturday and Planned Parenthood affiliates all over the country engaged in three Days of Action to call attention to the threats to Roe and the importance of who sits on the federal courts, the extremist anti-choice minority demonstrated in protest.

Apparently, many of them held signs that read, "Women Deserve Better."

I agree. Women do deserve better.

For the past three decades, anti-choice ideologues have been chipping away at the foundations of Roe. Hitting hardest at the poor, the young, and the weakest among us. In many ways, Roe is just a ghost of what it was in 1973.

"Without access, legal abortion is meaningless," writes Laura Kaminker in a recent article. The financial and legal hurdles, and the limited availability of abortion services in many areas, mean that, for a large number of women, Roe v. Wade is an empty promise.

She speculates on the true motive behind the restrictions on Roe:

"Women must jump through hoops and over hurdles before they can terminate a pregnancy. These laws run the gamut of idiocy, from 48-hour waiting periods, to parental consent and notification for minors, to mandatory 'counseling,' which often involves coercion.

"These laws assume women are incompetent, irresponsible, and unable to make their own decisions. They also expose the anti-choice 'abortion is murder' argument for the smokescreen that it is. If abortion was murder, these types of laws would be anathema to the anti-choice crowd: what good is delaying murder? However, if one's goal is to control women and punish them for having sex and getting pregnant, then these laws make perfect sense."

Women deserve better. Women deserve to be trusted as moral decision makers. Women deserve access to necessary reproductive health care.

Yesterday, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid introduced the "Prevention First Act". This bill will expand access to family planning services, ensure comprehensive medically accurate sex education, end insurance discrimination against women, promote emergency contraception, especially for sexual assault survivors, reduce the rates of teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, and reduce the need for abortion among women of all ages. This should be a no-brainer. The vast majority of Americans see nothing controversial whatsoever in contraception and strongly support family planning. This law would reduce the rate of unintended pregnancy and reduce the number of abortions, all while protecting women's lives.

Do women deserve anything less?"

They just SO don't get it! Roe v. Wade was a sham, railroaded down our throats on lies, lies and more lies.

Abortion, as a MEDICAL procedure was LEGAL in ALL 50 states prior to Roe v. Wade. Roe v. Wade allowed abortion on demand for any reason. It's become a birth control of choice for some families or single women. It just infuriates me that these nutcases have been able to feed us this line all these years.

Thank you God for turning the tide!