Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Female crickets choosey with their mates [Hawaiian cricket is world's fastest-evolving invertebrate]
Lehigh University ^ | February 3, 2005 | Kurt Pfitzer

Posted on 02/06/2005 5:48:12 AM PST by snarks_when_bored

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
 
The thumbnail-sized Laupala spawns new species at the rate of 4.17 every one million years, or more than 10 times faster than the average speciation rate for invertebrates.

This bears repeating: a speciation rate of 4.17 new species every 1 million years is very, very fast, indeed, 10 times faster than the average speciation rate for invertebrates. It's no wonder that we're not witnessing new species proliferating all around us (as some would claim ought to be happening). By human standards of time reckoning, evolution is an achingly slow process.

Worth noting, too, is the fact that Tamra Mendelson and her co-investigator, Kerry Shaw, spent three-and-one-half years studying the Laupala cricket.

 

1 posted on 02/06/2005 5:48:13 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; longshadow; PatrickHenry

Ping


2 posted on 02/06/2005 5:48:57 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
Hawaiian cricket is world's fastest-evolving invertebrate

Cricket's are not invertebrates. They are an insect, they have an exoskeleton.
3 posted on 02/06/2005 5:52:09 AM PST by RetroWarrior ("We count it death to falter, not to die")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
Weeds are beginning to develop a resistance to "Roundup" herbicide: this is an evolution that's taken place in the last 30 years alone. Evolution is all around us, even if certain among us refuse to see it.

Roundup Resistance

4 posted on 02/06/2005 5:57:04 AM PST by pickemuphere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetroWarrior

Perhaps the writer meant 'non-vertebrate'? Anyway, thanks...


5 posted on 02/06/2005 5:59:31 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pickemuphere
Do weeds exhibit a preference, then ?
6 posted on 02/06/2005 6:01:45 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pickemuphere

Right, humans have accelerated evolution in many ways (antibiotic-resistant bacteria also come to mind, not to mention domesticated animals and the like). I suppose the writer was considering 'natural evolution' or 'evolution considered apart from human activity' or something like that.


7 posted on 02/06/2005 6:06:44 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RetroWarrior
Cricket's are not invertebrates. They are an insect, they have an exoskeleton.

Invertebrates means they don't have a backbone. In general, any animal that's not a fish, amphibian, reptile, bird or mammal.

8 posted on 02/06/2005 6:08:59 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Blackwell for Governor 2006: hated by the 'Rats, feared by the RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
The Laupala mating ritual lasts up to eight hours and consists of eight to 15 transfers of spermatophores between male and female

I remember those times, years ago.

9 posted on 02/06/2005 6:13:11 AM PST by greydog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio; RetroWarrior
From Dictionary.com:

in·ver·te·brate (n-vûrt-brt, -brt)
adj.

  1. Lacking a backbone or spinal column; not vertebrate.
  2. Of or relating to invertebrates.
n.
An animal, such as an insect or a mollusk, that lacks a backbone or spinal column.

Source: The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary
Copyright © 2002, 2001, 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.

10 posted on 02/06/2005 6:14:48 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: greydog

Uh-huh. Yep. Right.


11 posted on 02/06/2005 6:16:39 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Do weeds exhibit a preference, then ?

Yes. They prefer not to die. :)

12 posted on 02/06/2005 6:22:50 AM PST by pickemuphere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
"Mendelson spent three-and-one-half years fiddling around with Laupala crickets."
13 posted on 02/06/2005 6:24:47 AM PST by ASA Vet (We had almost 100,000 KIA in WW III. It wasn't cold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greydog

ditto. In my BG (before gray) years.


14 posted on 02/06/2005 6:35:32 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
"Closely related species of Laupala have no clear morphological differences, Mendelson says. They are similar in appearance, they have similar diets, and they live in similar habitats. Members of closely related species possess no physiological differences that would prevent them from interbreeding."

This is speciation? What's the difference? This is how life was created? This is how wings evolved? This is how the spine evolved?

15 posted on 02/06/2005 6:36:49 AM PST by Jabba the Nutt (Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

This is fantastic. Crickets are evolving into crickets.


16 posted on 02/06/2005 6:46:13 AM PST by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Who paid for that 3.5 years....? LOL!


17 posted on 02/06/2005 7:06:19 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pickemuphere

Adaptation is NOT evolution.


18 posted on 02/06/2005 7:13:01 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt
This is speciation? What's the difference? This is how life was created? This is how wings evolved? This is how the spine evolved?

Patience, grasshopper cricket, patience. 3.8 billion years is a long, long, long, long, long, ... time.

19 posted on 02/06/2005 7:20:18 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored; sayfer bullets; concretebob
Wow!... Imagine... If only man were as intelligent as these female crickets, maybe we could evolve ourselves some wings and strong legs too!


20 posted on 02/06/2005 7:27:50 AM PST by Safrguns (It's Bush's Fault I owe $5.00 to FR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson