You have repeatedly put words in my mouth on this thread and attributed conclusions and aversions to me that I never made. "...Or you wouldn't be saying that propagandizing children into a homosexual lifestyle is nonsense." Obviously I NEVER said anything like that. But that did not stop you from claiming once again in 193 that I had.
I have made no comment about "forced hugs" and don't consider that to be a major crime UNLIKE the claim of genital touching which IS a major crime EVERYWHERE. Nor can I properly respond to your interpretations of events which happened to your children. I am not much of a follower of Maslow's writings though tend to be less than impressed by psychologists in general.
My late wife was a teacher in Chicago and do not dispute that there is much that is not good going on in the schools but if you believe they are all controlled by pro-homo groups or are implementing a prohomo agenda you are simply incorrect and it doesn't matter what testimony before Congress 20 yrs ago said since you know very well how THAT works. And prior to 1984 any prohomo propaganda was very insignificant EVERYWHERE in the country.
My younger son is a junior in college but there is NO doubt that any prohomo propaganda he or his brother may have encountered in school had exactly the opposite effect intended. The kids use the word "gay" to describe things which were lame, stupid or foolish. While I despise homosexuality I never encouraged that kind of talk.
Actually, given the way kids react to school, prohomo propaganda would likely be rejected by them as a matter of course.
Sorry, but you did say what Dr. Dobson is claiming, and what we are claiming, is nonsense. And ridiculing Dr. Dobson and us for stating there's a homosexual agenda in the classrooms is ridiculous. It's so very obvious you DIDN'T READ WHAT DR. DOBSON ACTUALLY SAID, did you? It's so very obvious you DIDN'T READ ANY OF THE CURRICULUM about which he or we spoke, did you?
I have made no comment about "forced hugs" and don't consider that to be a major crime UNLIKE the claim of genital touching which IS a major crime EVERYWHERE.
Point to the post where I ever said YOU made a comment about forced hugs.
Point to the post where I ever used the words "genital touching."
if you believe they are all controlled by pro-homo groups or are implementing a prohomo agenda you are simply incorrect....
Where did I say that "they are all controlled by pro-homo groups"?
As far as implementing a pro-homosexual agenda....provide specific information that you can cite that there isn't any implementation of a pro-homosexual agenda in schools.
it doesn't matter what testimony before Congress 20 yrs ago said since you know very well how THAT works. What testimony doesn't matter?
If you claim the materials complained about at the Congressional Hearings are not longer being used, name the specific types of materials no longer being used. Do you even know about the type of materials discussed in the hearings (the psychological manipulative ones about which I speak)? Since you portray yourself as so well versed in this matter, I'm sure you don't need me to tell you the specifics, but I shall: it's under the umbrella of affective education or Outcome Based Education (OBE).
Those materials complained about during the Congressional Hearings, however, ARE STILL BEING USED today in classrooms across the country, and, therefore, those hearings STILL DO MATTER.
And prior to 1984 any prohomo propaganda was very insignificant EVERYWHERE in the country.
So, now you agree, there is a pro-homosexual propaganda, it is being used in classrooms EVERYWHERE in the country, and its usage has INCREASED.