At which of my previous posts did I single out a CARTOON character? I didn't; YOU did.
You wanted specifics concerning my claims that hundreds of FReepers' have blithe attitudes concerning the homosexual agenda with children because you don't THINK that's true. All I said was that because THIS SALON ARTICLE'S INTENT is to continue ridiculing Dr. Dobson, I would stay ON TOPIC from which to provide you examples. Why did you twist that into "singling out a cartoon character"?
You were provided examples to see the WILFULL IGNORANCE of FREEPERS CONCERNING THE PRO-HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA: 4 threads totaling 1,682 posts from which to peruse. That would give you a gist of those blithe attitudes for yourself.
Beside the 4 threads I gave you from which to read, scripter gave you 25 more to educate yourself concerning the homosexual agenda and the We Are Family Foundation (WAFF). In addition to the 4 I provided, at least 17 that specter provided also deals with factual information concerning ACTUAL curriculum being used in classrooms (with links to dozens more), exposing the WAFF's lies and agenda (with links to dozens of links now deleted/removed from the WAFF after Dr. Dobson and the American Family Association criticized and exposed WAFF), and Dr. Dobson's clarification about what he ACTUALLY said vs. what the MEDIA CLAIMS HE SAID.....if spectre's 25 threads were too much reading, couldn't you have at least read through the entire 4 example threads I provided?
Did you read any of the posts concerning the curriculum?
DID YOU EVEN LOOK AT THE CURRICULUM?
There is a sample page of "Writing for Change" (curriculum being used in school) provided as a .jpg on two threads, so you didn't even have to do "extra work" by going to the links provided offsite if you didn't want to just "take our word for it" that the curriculum is encouraging young children to think about and experiment with homosexual behavior...."because homosexuality is as 'good' as or 'the same as' heterosexuality".....
Did you read anything about the We Are Family Foundation, the organization behind this video, and what their stated claims are vs. what the truth is? That despite their claims to the contrary, they do promote pro-homosexuality in the classroom and with children?
Did you go to links provided on the threads that were saved (via google cache and the wayback machine) from the WAFF website that exposes their LIES about their agenda? Or did you just look at the cartoons because it would be too much of an effort to actually educate yourself?
YOU, Sivad, by your own words, have shown yourself to be yet another example of those FReepers who wish to remain WILFULLY IGNORANT and make blithe and/or derogatory remarks about those who are concerned about what is going on: there is a homosexual agenda which is targeting school children, to the detriment of those children.
bykrbayb said it best (POST 181):
You tell me I'm barking up the wrong tree, then you procede to say what I've been saying all along. I'm sick of dealing with you idiots who still think this is about homosexual cartoon characters.....Read the documents before you make any more false statements about what I and others are saying.
Again, tossing around terms like "idiots" is pretty easy
to do on the internet. Perhaps you and I can also arrange
a face to face.
In your post that I originally responded to you stated:
"As evidenced by people posting here, it is their type of
behavior that has allowed the homosexual's agenda to ad-
vance and spread so quickly across the country......"
"....people such as those posting here, instead, laugh at
and deride those who refuse to accept that homosexuality
is normal and vociferously object to children being re-
cruited into homosexuality."
From the start of the thread until your post the vast ma-
jority of posts humorously pointed at potential homosexuals
in the cartoon world and you claim that represents the
type of behavior that allows the homosexual agenda to
spread? No, it represents people who are joking about car-
toon characters. You have no idea whether or not any of
those posters attend school board meetings or write letters
to local newspapers with regard to fighting the homo agenda.
And, up to the point of your post, just who in the thread
was laughing at and deriding "those who refuse to accept
that homosexuality is normal and vociferously object to
children being recruited into homosexuality"? Because they
joke about cartoon characters? You know, you could have
started that post with something like "On a serious note..."
but you chose to read things into the posts that you can't
prove is there and attack the other posters with a diatribe
more suitable in a DU/PC jabberfest.
"All I said was because THIS SALON ARTICLE'S INTENT is to
continue ridiculing Dr. Dobson, I would stay ON TOPIC from
which to provide you examples. Why did you twist that into
'singling out a cartoon character'?"
The truth is that raccoonradio posted the SALON article
and his/her comment set the tone for the TOPIC. Go back
and check what raccoonradio had to say and maybe you will
understand that other posters just followed suit. You are
certainly free to re-post the SALON article with your own
comments to set your own tone.
I have no doubt that every concern that you and the others
have about the homosexual agenda is real. In fact, I made
a point to chat with two local school board members to
ascertain their positions. Thankfully, they don't buy into
the "homogenda".
My original response to you had nothing to do with whether
or not the gays are infiltrating our schools with their
garbage. Rather, I was pointing out that your post was
more heavy handed than it needed to be, IMO.