Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Not to mention explicitly protecting slavery and slave imports.

As did the federal Constitution.

I'll put you down for a 'no' to the "that's your definition of 'larger, more intrusive government'" question.

117 posted on 02/07/2005 2:15:41 PM PST by 4CJ (Laissez les bon FReeps rouler - Quo Gladius de Veritas - Deo vindice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: 4ConservativeJustices
As did the federal Constitution.

Not explicitly.

I'll put you down for a 'no' to the "that's your definition of 'larger, more intrusive government'" question.

No, the Davis regime was my defintion of a larger more intrusive government.

134 posted on 02/07/2005 3:02:23 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson