This is the right picture.
Posted on 02/05/2005 5:04:32 PM PST by gopwinsin04
Actually I believe Clint won that case at trial, I don't think he settled it.
MoDo should avoid trying to explain to her readers about being GOP..
Wowza! #50..
Check out post #79!
Wherefore art thou Maureen? A ditz by any other name would sound as vacuous.
Why do people always post pictures of Catherine Zeta-Jones on Maureen Dowd articles?
There's a new one.
For a while, Dowd was writing an absolutely scathing series of articles on x42clinton. Then she became involved with a very close relationship to the actor, Michael Douglas. The anti-Clinton articles stopped. When clinton was no longer president, Douglas immediately dropped dowdy Dowd and took up with Catherine Zeta Jones. I don't know that these are related; I'm stating only the timing.
People post pictures of Jones as a way of rubbing Dowd's nose in the use and rejection of her by Michael Douglas.
read later
Medved is addressing this right now.
ping for Medved and MDB
A thread like this presents a unique kind of quandry. Do you tear down the childishly left-wing, femi-Nazi hag that is Maureen O'Dowd (and she can't even write very well from a technical viewpoint either), or do you point out that the basic foundations of this particular article (building up the great man Clint Eastwood and tering down the lousy scumbag that is Michael Medved) happen to be pretty sound?
Oh, the hard, HARD choices we make sometimes on FR!
That pic of Catherine Zeta-Jones in post # 53-- OUCH!
I don't know if there's enough blood left in my head to finish this post, if you get my drift. CZJ: she scrapes liberal hags off movie stars like a champ, And she can sing and dance too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.