I'm saying there is a whole fossil record of animals preceding the whale who demonstrate diminishing limb structures. You screwed up on the second law interpretation, here is another example of where you are myopic.
At some point, your strict anti-evolutionist interpretation of the world will crack and fail. I'd like to suggest to you that this should not affect your faith in God at all, that there are mixtures of creationism and evolution that coexist quite easily. But you will have to open your eyes to understand the bigger picture, and that will be disturbing to say the least.
Actually, I'm not anti-evolution, but do believe that God created this universe for a purpose. From the literature that I have read (both in public school and on my own), I can only come to one conclusion.....creation seems more rational.....more believable and seems to take less faith. As I stated in previous posts, everything that I have read about Darwin seems to contradict itself in the end (especially his own experiments with pigeons and fruit flys).
I also recently read that the moth experiment was absolute bogus (this has always been a halmark of the evolutionist agend). The photo, of this touted classic illustration of natural selection, was found to be faked (the photo of the white moth against the soot colored tree). In fact, the article went on to say that the pepered moths fly about in the upper branches of the trees and don't perch on the trunks at all. In fact, Theodore Sargent of the University of Mass. admitted that he glued dead samples of the moths onto the tree trunks for a NOVA documentary. The respected journal Nature says the moth example, once the "prize horse in our stable" to illustrate evolution by natural selection must be thrown out.