Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gobucks

'What is science'?

Science is a basis of inquiry, using the formation and testing of an hypothesis, it's results must be duplicateable. Evolution is a theory, not a fact. It's fine as a theory, but anything that starts with a premise of "first there was nothing, and now there is everything" is leaving out something critical. IMHO, and I went to publick skool too, and got a 95 on the NY State Bio Regents.

You gotta wonder about the fear on the left, such craven fear they all exhibit, what is it they are so afraid of? They're weird, they really are.


12 posted on 02/05/2005 12:04:57 PM PST by jocon307 (Vote George Washington for the #1 spot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jocon307

Not sure when you took the Regent's but you seem to have some of the material wrong.

Most astronomy is not based on reproducible results.

Evolutionary theory does not address the origin of life and therefore does not start with nothing. It is a theory that proposes a mechanism to explain observations by biologists. Just like Gravitational Theory seeks to explain why things go splat.


17 posted on 02/05/2005 12:15:18 PM PST by From many - one. (formerly e p1uribus unum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307
Evolution is a theory, not a fact. It's fine as a theory, but anything that starts with a premise of "first there was nothing, and now there is everything" is leaving out something critical.

1) Do you know what a "theory" is, in the context of science?

2) Evolution does not have a premise of "first there was nothing, and now there is everything", so what relevance does that statement have with this discussion?
43 posted on 02/05/2005 12:58:53 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307
It's fine as a theory, but anything that starts with a premise of "first there was nothing, and now there is everything" is leaving out something critical. IMHO, and I went to publick skool too, and got a 95 on the NY State Bio Regents.

Once again IDers mistake the Theory of Evolution with the theory of how life began. Darwin's theory tries to explain speciation and the evolution of simple life forms into more complex ones. He does not take any position on how life came to be on Earth, just how it developed.

179 posted on 02/05/2005 3:16:13 PM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307
first there was nothing, and now there is everything

No, it isn't helpful at all to actually understand the idea that you are trying to criticize BEFORE you actually try to criticize it. /sarcasm

579 posted on 02/07/2005 5:43:30 AM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson