From a purely legal analysis, I can't even suggest why the judge made this decision. There's no legal theory to support it.
Nonetheless, we have several Freepers who totally agree with the judge, and some who think it would be okay if the girls were shot and killed.
I had no idea this story would be so divisive.
Some people aren't used to being disagreed with.
could it be that this judge was respecting property ownership? i don't know. but that is good in my book if so. i DON'T think it should have been brought to court in the first place from what i have read of it. but i always like it when judges side with property owners... ya know?
I haven't seen any posts that kind of agree with the judge let alone "totally".
And you'll please note the "spillover" argument was caused by a poster pinging me over here in some strange attempt to force me to recant my heresy.
LOL