Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cpforlife.org

Post 44 is for you, too.


45 posted on 02/05/2005 3:55:57 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Victoria Delsoul
Thanks Victoria!

LOL-- Now if only Judge Jeffrey Lawrence II could sit down the six stooges on SCOTUS who embrace Roe and read them the riot act! Hopefully this Judge will be tapped by President Bush.

---------------------------------------------

In a 1-14-05 article from Susan Wills, Esq., associate director for education, Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops:

And no one seriously suggests that Roe be protected because of its legal merit. Since 1973, six Supreme Court justices and scores of legal articles have criticized Roe and Doe for inventing a right to abortion not found in the Constitution and for usurping the right of states and the people to fashion laws that reflect their views on abortion. As a distinguished law professor, Michael S. Paulsen, put it: “Roe is an embarrassment—perhaps the worst work-product the Court has ever produced. … Roe’s reasoning is utterly laughable, a running joke in constitutional law circles.”

http://www.nccbuscc.org/prolife/publicat/lifeissues/011405.htm

48 posted on 02/05/2005 4:15:03 PM PST by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of The Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson