Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drt1


I'm wondering if it was just 1 embryo they made,

if they were commited pro life- then they probably wouldn't be for that in vitro fertilization,


15 posted on 02/05/2005 8:48:59 AM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( There's no Double Talk from Dubya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: LauraleeBraswell
Actually, the article states that a number of embryos were attempted and the single embryo was selected, the others being judged inferior in some respect.

It was this single embryo that was then discarded. I still suspect the motives of the couple and wonder if they have gone forward, elsewhere to achieve a desired pregnancy.

17 posted on 02/05/2005 8:53:46 AM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: LauraleeBraswell
**I'm wondering if it was just 1 embryo they made, if they were commited pro life- then they probably wouldn't be for that in vitro fertilization, **

Friends of ours are commited Christians and used the in-vitro method of conception. They made the decision and held to the belief that *all* embryos should be implanted. The first time they were able to implant one embryo (because only one was available) which resulted in a healthy birth of their little boy. The second attempt resulted in three embryos and of course all three were implanted. The triplets are now 7 months old. All four children are just beautiful!

My husband and I chose not to go that way. We're very blessed we were successful with an IUI procedure.

20 posted on 02/05/2005 9:39:33 AM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: LauraleeBraswell

According to the linked article at the Sun-Times, there were originally 9 embryos and only one was frozen. The article implies that that was the only one that was viable. And there is no explanation as to why there was a delay in implantation.

It's potentially ethically problematic that there were 9, then 8. But, if the other 8 never grew correctly, or died after a few divisions, then there's no ethical dilemma. In that case, they were creating human life for the sake of the children themselves, at least as much as any parent who plans and yearns for a child. So the manipulation, using God-given medical technology (IMHO) was ethical.

That is the key to ethical reproductive technology: respecting each human life for him or herself, even while utilizing high technology to initiate his or her life.


72 posted on 02/05/2005 10:49:45 PM PST by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson