[A. Pole]

He said if his family did not have access to a competent, highly paid law firm, he might still be in jail or prison, because the sheriff's office accepted Faanes' allegations at face value.

Freemarketeers approve. You should have as much justice as you can afford. Why the others should pay for it?

[MadIvan]

Freemarketeers approve. You should have as much justice as you can afford. Why the others should pay for it?

Your protectionist bullshite sniping has little to do with the truth and everything to do with your own anti-capitalist prejudices. It's a simple choice - you either allow the individual to make their choices in the marketplace, or let the government make that choice for them. Wise people realise the government has a poor appreciation for individual wants and needs - we've already been through this exercise a number of times and it's been a colossal, repressive failure. You and Willie Green and Pat Buchanan and other pompous, anti-capitalist bastards smugly think you know better anyway.

How many times do you have to be wrong before you bite your tongue, I wonder? How many times does the government have to screw up before you accept it's not a good way to do things? How many times are you going take responsibility for yourself rather than blame China or India for your ills?

In any event, there won't be a reversal of present free trade policies. Grow up and deal with it. Or don't and remain pathetic.

Ivan

[MadIvan]

By the way, you are particularly stupid to turn an article about the criminal justice system into a critique of the free market.

Ivan

[palmer]

I have to agree with Ivan on this one, maybe you mixed up laissez-faire and l'affaire