Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HAL9000

As usual the news stories leave out really important details.

The story states: "the 253.6 gram of dense gray metal was 99 per cent uranium by weight".

Later they talk about "weapons-grade" uranium, but they never explicitly say that what was found was "weapons-grade".

Metal that is 99 per cent uranium could be "depleted uranium" for all we know.


9 posted on 02/05/2005 3:13:26 AM PST by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sd-joe
Quite. It was almost certainly not WG uranium, it was probably almost entirely U-238. The story writer probably is confused about chemical vs. isotopic composition. Refining uranium out of ore results in chemically pure uranium metal, perhaps 1% traces of other stuff left as described in the article. But enrichment is separating out the U-235 - barely 1% of natural uranium samples - from the majority of U-238. U-238 is much more stable, with an order of magnitude longer half life (4 billion years).
14 posted on 02/05/2005 5:40:51 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: sd-joe

It was neither 99 per cent uranium nor weapons grade.

Merely a case of over enthusiastic reporting.

The Atomic Energy Regulatory Board ( AERB )tested the material and found it to contain 0.21% U 235.

See this link :

http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1229801,000600010004.htm


15 posted on 02/06/2005 4:57:38 AM PST by Qaz_W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson