Posted on 02/04/2005 10:12:56 PM PST by rwh
CHEYENNE (AP) A House committee debated Thursday morning whether it should strengthen the seat belt law by allowing motorists to be held partly responsible for their crash injuries when they fail to buckle up. The measure also would allow a driver to be pulled over solely for not using a seat belt and would increase the fine for drivers from $25 to $50 and for passengers from $10 to $25. This is a bill thats not going to stop accidents, but it will reduce fatalities, said the sponsor, Rep. Jerry Iekel, R-Sheridan. Under current law, authorities can only cite a motorist for violation of the seat belt law if the driver was pulled over for another offense. But drawing the most interest from the House Judiciary Committee was the provision that could allow partial blame for injuries to be assigned to vehicle occupants who dont buckle up. Current law prohibits a defendant from introducing evidence that a person injured in an accident was partly at fault for his injuries because he failed to wear a seat belt. You would share in the division of responsibility, Iekel told the panel. It seems to fit with the intent of the bill ... that has to do with personal responsibility. Brent Kunz, a lobbyist for State Farm Insurance Co., spoke in favor of the bill. As a Wyomingite, I respect our way of life. I, too, would like to have the freedom and not have government restriction on what I can and cant do, but with the seat belt law its a little bit different, he said. The measure could save not only lives but costs to society and costs to insured drivers, he said. But Rep. Edward Buchanan, R-Torrington, wondered if the Legislature should shift responsibility away from a person who causes a crash. Do you expect me to wear to wear a crash helmet too because of your negligence? he said. How far is the government going to go in making sure were safe in everything we do? ... How about adult car seats? He suggested a better approach might be to further reward motorists for seat belt use when theyre convicted of other traffic violations. Currently, a person receives a $10 reduction of a fine if wearing a belt. Buchanan suggested increasing the credit to $30 or $40. The bill is House Bill 301.
whoops...I can't count.
Should be 5-8. Must sleep!
We as a society have decided that going 70 MPH and getting to our destination faster is worth the trade off of a few deaths. "Safety" laws just make us feel a little less guilty about our decision.
Just make the maximum speed limit 25 MPH and the seatbelt issue goes away.
I still don't use the damn things. They are worthless unless you install a racing harness and roll cage.
[We must accept that even when armed with all the factssome people will still choose risky behavior. Instead of saving us from ourselves, regulators should take a deep breath, allow beltless motorists to put themselves at risk, and go hassle the dangerous drivers.]
Yup.
10. TREES. We need to cut down ALL trees. Trees are always falling on people killing them. This is unacceptable. In the interest of everyone's safety tress need to be gone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.