Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timeout

Look for a retraction in tomorrow's paper, if they have any journalistic integrity at all. They got that part wrong; the judge would be asking for an impossibility if it was accurate.


64 posted on 02/04/2005 7:07:05 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Hank Rearden; All
They got that part wrong; the judge would be asking for an impossibility if it was accurate.

Unfortunately, the judge may be correct.

RCW 29A.68.110

Illegal votes -- Number of votes affected -- Enough to change result.

No election may be set aside on account of illegal votes, unless it appears that an amount of illegal votes has been given to the person whose right is being contested, that, if taken from that person, would reduce the number of the person's legal votes below the number of votes given to some other person for the same office, after deducting therefrom the illegal votes that may be shown to have been given to the other person.

It all depends on what “appears” means, and how it is determined.

91 posted on 02/05/2005 8:30:02 AM PST by Friend of thunder (No sane person wants war, but oppressors want oppression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson