Posted on 02/04/2005 2:29:29 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo
Insurgents will have a tougher time targeting U.S. troops riding in Humvees and other vehicles in Iraq come Feb. 15.
That's when, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld told CNN interviewer Larry King Feb. 3, "there will not be a vehicle moving around in Iraq anywhere outside of a protected compound that does not have the appropriate armor."
Speaking to King from the Pentagon via a video hookup, Rumsfeld noted that specialists had been flown into Iraq in recent weeks to attach shipped-in supplemental armor to various U.S. military vehicles.
(Excerpt) Read more at dod.mil ...
Granted this will help, but armor isn't the end-all be-all answer so many think it is; as sll the bad-guys need to do is build bigger bombs to defeat the up-armored vehicles.
Anti-tank mines have been around for a long time; and they have demonstrated themselves to be very effective at destroying the most heavily armored vehicles man has ever built.
I was only using the AT mine example to illustrate that armor is not the savior that the media is making it out to be.
I am well aware that the IED's are employed differently than mines, however, the fact remains that the IED's will be getting bigger in the days, weeks, and months to come, and we may well continue to suffer casulaties from them. Lord willing, the larger devices will be easier to detect and avoid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.