It seems you keep attempting to use the fact that they were able to know the identity of 46 as evidence that there must be a process of identifying secret ballots or else there couldn't be a standard for discovering the identity of secret ballots, and the fact that neither Rossi or you has been able to discover this secret process is incidental.
I don't know Faulkes from a hole in my floor, but I think I'll wait for the rest of the story on this one.
Under this interpretation of that clause of the law, the only time you can contest based on illegal votes is when you catch someone red-handed stuffing the ballot box and you can identify and remove the ballots they stuffed!! Do you realize how exceedingly rare that is? That is why many, many of us disagree with torridjoe on this point as the rest of the contest statute and other election law doesn't set impossibly high standards like that, so why would this one?
And, it appears the judge agrees at least somewhat based on his ruling yesterday.........