This is from a comment on the SP thread:
"On illegal votes--the Democrats say Rossi must prove the votes were invalid. Bridges ruled it was premature to make that discovery. On using statute 68 .020 from the RCW as the sole basis for what is contestable, Bridges ruled that while they (Rossi) fail on .020, .11 CAN and does apply."
http://www.soundpolitics.com/archives/003700.html
* On illegal votes--the Democrats say....
However, 68 .090 allows Rossi to claim that the errors found are enough to open the question of whether the election was legitimate. Thus, the motion to dismiss based on the cause of illegal votes is DENIED.
Hmmmmm.........I think maybe the reporter got it wrong, but I admit I am confused.......
I AGREE SOMETHING IS WRONG BUT WHAT IS 68.090? JUST LOOKING AT THE FACT THE JUDGE DENIED THE MOTION TO DISMISS MEANS 68.090 GIVES REDRESS PROVISIONS FOR THE ROSSI SIDE.