Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tancredo hits Bush on immigration
Manchester Union Leader ^ | February 4, 2005 | Gary Rayno

Posted on 02/04/2005 4:26:13 AM PST by billorites

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Route101
You are right.

Why would anyone defend illegal aliens? Has to be at least one of the following reasons:
Personal financial gain
Blackmail
Mental defect
Hatred of this country, wanting to stick it to us
Involvement with terrorists
Love of the One World concept

41 posted on 02/04/2005 9:42:06 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
>"H.R. 418 was submitted by Sensenbrenner, Tancredo is only a co-sponsor."<

- Well, there is nothing wrong with consolidating legislative efforts. Every Congressman doesn't need to write separate legislation.


>"And from what I have scanned in the text, it is not nearly enough."<

In what areas is it lacking?

At least it covers the drivers license issue, which it appears that the Bush administration does not support; or am I incorrect in that assumption?

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c109:1:./temp/~c1091T8aNP:e530:

Btw, how many drivers licenses did the 19 9/11 terrorists have between them?
It was something like 65, I believe.

Regards
42 posted on 02/04/2005 9:44:03 AM PST by FBD ("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FBD
FYI:

Alexandria, VA: Speaking out for the first time on the question of immigration enforcement, the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) today announced its opposition to the Clear Law Enforcement For Criminal Alien Removal (CLEAR) Act and urged Congress to proceed with caution when considering measures that would compel local and state law enforcement agencies to enforce federal immigration laws. The IACP took this action after a careful review of the impact that enforcing immigration law could have on state, tribal and local law enforcement and the communities they serve.

“The IACP opposes any plan that would coerce local and state law enforcement agencies to enforce federal immigration laws without their approval,” said IACP President Joseph Estey, Chief of the Hartford, Vermont Police Department. “Many leaders in the law enforcement community have serious concerns about the chilling effect any measure of this nature would have on legal and illegal aliens reporting criminal activity or assisting police in criminal investigations. This lack of cooperation could diminish the ability of law enforcement agencies to police effectively their communities and protect the public they serve.” {blah, blah, blah}...

Immigration Forum

And speaking of LA, maybe you should have read the story preceding your statistics on that website you linked to:

The LAPD’s ban on immigration enforcement mirrors bans in immigrant-saturated cities around the country, from New York and Chicago to San Diego, Austin, and Houston. These “sanctuary policies” generally prohibit city employees, including the cops, from reporting immigration violations to federal authorities.

The enforcement is being thwarted at the local level.
43 posted on 02/04/2005 9:45:43 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FBD
In what areas is it lacking?

H.R. 3534 (introduced by Rep. Tom Tancredo)

Just one example is the following excerpt:

b) SPECIAL RULE ON CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH FOR CHILDREN OF H NONIMMIGRANTS- Notwithstanding title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.), or any other law, a child born in the United States to a parent who is a nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15)(H) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (as amended by section 210 of this Act) shall not be a national or citizen of the United States at birth unless the other parent is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence.

44 posted on 02/04/2005 9:55:53 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Can you imagine the uproar if Bush was this dishonest and hypocritical?

"The issue is where do you get cheaper workers. Cheap is only that to employers, not to the American taxpayers," Tancredo said.

Illegal labor aided Tancredo

Whopper of the Week: Rep. Tom Tancredo (term limit lie)

45 posted on 02/04/2005 9:56:47 AM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Bump!


46 posted on 02/04/2005 9:57:05 AM PST by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Stop the invasion before it's too late!
Tancredo for President in 2008!

47 posted on 02/04/2005 9:59:45 AM PST by paleocon patriarch ("Never attribute to a conspiracy that which can be explained by incompetence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PRND21

The illegal labour story is BS. Essentually, Tancredo hired a contractor to fix his basement, who hired a subcontractor for some work. The subcontractor unwittingly hired an illegal alien.


48 posted on 02/04/2005 10:00:21 AM PST by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dane

"opening up more resources to go after terrorists"

No, it will keep open the borders for millions more of ILLEGAL aliens to keep sucking the resources of this country dry.


49 posted on 02/04/2005 10:03:52 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: billorites

BTTT for later...


50 posted on 02/04/2005 10:04:03 AM PST by ApesForEvolution (I just took a Muhammad and wiped my Jihadist with Mein Koran...come and get me nutbags.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Essentually, Tancredo hired a contractor to fix his basement, who hired a subcontractor for some work. The subcontractor unwittingly hired an illegal alien.

Unwittingly? Why didn't Tom do anything about it? Too busy deporting high school honor students to police his own house?

51 posted on 02/04/2005 10:06:39 AM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: billorites

A big Tancredo BTTT...


52 posted on 02/04/2005 10:08:56 AM PST by Ron H. (Compassionate Conservatism is just a catchy sounding euphemism for being a liberal RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
T '08
53 posted on 02/04/2005 10:23:16 AM PST by adam_az (UN out of the US! - http://www.moveamericaforward.org/?Page=Petition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PRND21

You're quoting SLATE for hecks sake.

Both of those articles are quite incomplete hackery.


54 posted on 02/04/2005 10:24:07 AM PST by adam_az (UN out of the US! - http://www.moveamericaforward.org/?Page=Petition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
That is a good thing, imo. Note that it says:
"or an alien lawfully admitted..."

Giving illegal immigrants the right to stay in the country because they have an "anchor baby", is not respectful of our legal immigration process, imo.

My nurse friend who lived in Yuma, AZ tells me it's epidemic there.

Regards
55 posted on 02/04/2005 10:25:56 AM PST by FBD ("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
Both of those articles are quite incomplete hackery.

They are both fact.
He DID recant his term limit pledge.
He DID have illegals do work in his home.

56 posted on 02/04/2005 10:27:36 AM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: adam_az; PRND21
You're quoting SLATE for hecks sake.

Wonder if PRND21 ever puts up the 'whoppers' his link carries about GWB, Rove, Ridge, etc.etc.??

57 posted on 02/04/2005 10:33:12 AM PST by txdoda ("Navy Brat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: FBD

Yes it is a real good thing...but I sure didn't see anything like that in the legislation currently in Congress. It needs to be there.


58 posted on 02/04/2005 10:33:54 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter; Marine Inspector

>"The enforcement is being thwarted at the local level."<

No doubt that is part of the problem.
Thank you for that info. I'll peruse it.

However, there must be a reason citizens in states like Arizona (and now Arkansas) are enacting legislation like Prop 200:
..and they don't appear to be getting much support from lawmakers at either the state OR federal level.

FReeper "Marine Inspector is a customs and border patrol officer. I'll defer to him:

What say you, Marine Inspector? Is this merely a problem with local officials not wanting to enforce immigration laws, or is the federal govt. complicit as well??

Regards


59 posted on 02/04/2005 10:37:15 AM PST by FBD ("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PRND21

Sheesh, guess what. That food you ate yesterday, AN ILLEGAL PICKED IT!


60 posted on 02/04/2005 10:38:23 AM PST by adam_az (UN out of the US! - http://www.moveamericaforward.org/?Page=Petition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson