You've claimed this article is a repost.
You were wrong.
You were informed of your error.
You continued to make the claim.
As such, your claim moves from an error to a lie.
But then why do I waste logic on you, when it seems simple math is the issue at hand?
Again, count with me...
1...2...3...4
You'll note, hopefully with the help of the Count, that one of those numbers represents a singular amount.
You were wrong.
*snicker* You forgot to say "troll."
As such, your claim moves from an error to a lie.
Myself, Admin Moderator, TommyDale, Archangel86 and The Coopster are all liars. Gotcha. But you cannot possibly be wrong. Oh, no.
1...2...3...4
Now you're getting it!
Let's try another counting game.
Let's say that I post an article entitled "The Pope's Health Worsens" and you post another entitled "The Pope is Ill."
How may times has the information contained in your article been posted on FR?
I know you are going to say ONCE!
As such, I encourage you to go read the mod's thread. There you may find that your "The Pope is Ill" thread, even though it may contain some new nugget of information, would have been better placed as a comment on the first thread.
Is any of this getting through?