Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul C. Jesup
"This is the first push against the I.R.S. this year, not the last."

This is the correct perspective. The giant has to be hit with many arrows before he falls. The first was the hearings in the 90's by the newly elected Gingrich majority. This is the second. The third and fourth are not going to take 10 more years to hit. They will all hit this year. The giant will be quite prickly by December.

383 posted on 02/03/2005 3:40:09 PM PST by ALWAYSWELDING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: ALWAYSWELDING
This is the correct perspective. The giant has to be hit with many arrows before he falls. The first was the hearings in the 90's by the newly elected Gingrich majority. This is the second. The third and fourth are not going to take 10 more years to hit. They will all hit this year. The giant will be quite prickly by December.

Actually King's bill is the third hit, if that 2nd Curcuit Appeals Court ruling is correct that the IRS cannot just force someone to reveal their records just by 'requesting' them and instead the IRS has to first go to court to force someone to turn over their records

396 posted on 02/03/2005 3:58:35 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

To: ALWAYSWELDING

The appeals court ruling I am talking about took place a couple of days ago.


398 posted on 02/03/2005 3:59:59 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson