Of course. I was wondering how long it would be before someone dragged that one out again. Is there no other weapon left in the Bushbot arsenal than to say the other guy would be worse?
She is referring to NEW security forces, as in the security forces in the newly democratic Iraq.
OK, so why in hell would be be arming ANY Palestinians? Can you tell me that?
Oh.. wait, here's something I cleared up at the end of the article, wow this is something:
(ATTN BUSH LEGIONS: Go forth to proclaim the good word of Lord Bush! Deflect any criticism of this news as heresy against the Blessed President and unpatriotic! Twist logic and words... Obfuscate... Change issues... Remember, do all and say all in defense of the Exalted Ruler Bush and all that is his whim! Hail Bush...)
So those are your operating orders. Explains a lot...
As to the statement.....which I have repeatedly asked you to read without bias......there is no statement of time involved. Unless you believe that all Palestinians are evil for all time, you cannot say there is no circumstance under which they can be safely armed (as the Iraqis presently are), ever in the future.
And with your final paragraph, you ARE blaspheming, and revealing your own personal weakness.
There is no point in trying to rationally discuss a subject with one as irrational as you clearly are, so consider this conversation over.
I forgot we are forbidden from expressing any opinion that seems too similar to Bush's. We need to appear "fair and balanced" so we don't seem to be right-wing zealots.
Grow up - just because you disagree and Bush agrees doesn't mean I'm a Bushbot any more than you disagreeing with the administration make you a Deaniac.