Do you think that President Bush, the same man who has stood up for the military, stood against the Taliban and Saddam Hussein, who has ignored the attacks of the democrats and done what is right for our country...do you think this same man is going to appoint someone to the Attorney General's position that is going to grab your guns and open the borders? Would it nor make more sense that perhaps someone who opposes Gonzalez is exagerrating and making up stuff in order to poison his nomination? Does it not make MORE sense that Gonzalez is a good appointment, just like Rice and Rumsfeld are, and that certain people are stirring the pot for their own reasons?
No need for a lengthy debate, but I would like you to seriously consider this possibility before answering.
And I think Michelle Malkin is a good columnist but she is not above exagerrating herself, and she is NOT an expert on immigration, merely somone who has a strong opinion and writes supporting her opinion. That is not the definition of an expert.
Is it un-PC to suggest that ZULU is Mau-Mau-ing himself?
You make a good argument. But did you approve of Whitman as Environmental Commissioner, Tom Kean as head of the 9-1-1 Commission, Colin Powell as head of the State Department or Norman Minetta as head of Transportation?
I can't watch these hearing where I am now. Maybe later. Maybe I will cahnge my mind.
But so far NOBODY has pointed me to any sources which refuted those comments. I'm a big boy and I can admit that that the statements I made were incorrect. If Gonzales gets appointed I hope I am wrong. But just show me something somewhere that indicates Gonzales is a conservative politically and doesn't hold those views which I find unacceptable.