If Jordan's charges are true, then it means that he (and CNN) have knowledge of criminal activity by the military and have covered it up. Consequently, Jordan should be fired.
But, if Jordan's charges are false, then he has made unsupported and irresponsible claims of the most inflammatory nature about our armed forces in a time of war. And he should be fired. Then, perhaps, prosecuted.
Which is it, CNN? Did the boss step in it with his left foot or his right? Or both? And what are you going to do about it? Because, irrespective of the validity of Jordan's charges, he should be dismissed forthwith. The only question is whether you want to follow him into the abyss...
yeah, good point. If there is anything to this then where the hell has CNN been on this story?! Were they just saving their "exclusive" for Davos?