Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld Backs Nuclear Bunker Buster Bomb To Hit Iran Atom Sites
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 2-2-2005 | Francis Harris

Posted on 02/01/2005 5:45:46 PM PST by blam

Rumsfeld backs nuclear bunker bomb to hit Iran atom sites

By Francis Harris in Washington
(Filed: 02/02/2005)

The Pentagon wants to revive a controversial programme to build nuclear warheads capable of penetrating hardened underground targets such as Iran's covert nuclear facilities.

A leaked memo from Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, to the energy department proposed funding for the scheme to begin next year. "You can count on my support for your efforts to revitalise the nuclear weapons infrastructure and to complete the RNEP (robust nuclear earth penetrator) study," Mr Rumsfeld wrote in a memo seen by the Washington Post.

The leak seems certain to trigger a major row with Congress, which eliminated the scheme from the budget last year.

That decision was made at the behest of Republican legislators angered by estimates suggesting the programme would cost more than $500 million (£265 million). The Bush administration has long emphasised that the scheme is merely a question of research and that Congress would have to approve the production of such weapons.

Democrats too were outraged, arguing that programmes to improve nuclear weapons made their use more likely and undermined US efforts to halt the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in other countries. The Arms Control Association, a pressure group which has opposed the bunker-buster scheme, said: "The administration is missing a key opportunity to make good on the congressional decision last year... it sends the wrong signal to the international community on the US approach on non-proliferation."

The US military has been studying bunker-busting weapons with renewed vigour since the September 11 attacks.

Osama bin Laden is believed to favour underground caves as a hiding place and used the Tora Bora network in the mountains of Afghanistan when he fled US-led forces in late 2001.

At the time, the Americans used the so-called Daisy Cutter, at 15,000lb the world's largest conventional bomb but still a thousand time less powerful than the weapon used at Hiroshima.

That has turned military minds back to the nuclear options, not least because the American military may one day be asked to launch raids against Iranian facilities.

The Americans believe the Iranians are working on building nuclear warheads despite Teheran's denials. The Islamic regime is also working on medium-range missiles capable of reaching Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and US forces in the Middle East.

Other longer-range missiles capable of reaching Europe are also being developed, the Americans believe.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: atom; backs; bomb; bunker; bunkerbuster; hit; iran; nuclear; rumsfeld; site
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: blam

and we need them. Shep Smith did a report while in Baghdad for the election - showing one of Saddam's underground bunkers, almost untouched even though we hit it multiple times with conventional bunker busters. The discovery channel had a similar show a while back. the truth is, we cannot penetrate these nuclear sites if their bunker technology (from eastern europe) is as good as shown in these reports. either we nuke them, or we need a ground invasion to seize the facilities.


21 posted on 02/01/2005 5:58:21 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

He should get the esteemed honor of pushing the red button.


22 posted on 02/01/2005 5:59:49 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (PEST/Suicide Hotline 1-800-BUSH-WON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThermoNuclearWarrior
"... the energy department proposed funding for the scheme to begin next year."

Or to let the mullahs know they can rest easy, knowing they haven't even started on them, yet.

23 posted on 02/01/2005 6:00:44 PM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

You would think we woiuld considering the fact that any of us can go to Global Security.org and see that Iran is building dozens of underground Nuclear facilities. They say it's for peaceful purposes, I say "Horse Hockey"


24 posted on 02/01/2005 6:00:53 PM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: blam

ROBUST- I like that word. Mrs Folgers used that all the time in her coffee ads.


25 posted on 02/01/2005 6:01:39 PM PST by Rakkasan1 (john f'n kerry-the original 'million dollar baby'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Some of Saddam's bunker withstood direct hits by our 5,000 pound GBU-28. These were designed to be able to destroy anything but even repeated hits by these things couldn't destroy every bunker. One bunker took 1/2 a dozen GBU-28's with little effect. I took a GBU-28 right now the main air vent to finally destroy it.
26 posted on 02/01/2005 6:03:16 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blam

Whatever my Rummy wants to do, is ok with me. Go, Rummy!!! You're my man!!


27 posted on 02/01/2005 6:03:19 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThermoNuclearWarrior; drt1
This leak was intentional and sanctioned at the highest levels.

It's a warning shot across Iran's bow.

28 posted on 02/01/2005 6:07:10 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blam

These are essential weapons--and not only for cave rats like Osama. The leaderships of places like Russia, China, and North Korea have to understand that you can run but you cannot hide from the power of the US. An attack on US has to be seen as a suicide attack for the leadership of any nation mad enough to try it. Congressional oppponents should be investigated for financial ties to foreign powers.


29 posted on 02/01/2005 6:09:02 PM PST by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Either that or spitballs.


30 posted on 02/01/2005 6:10:40 PM PST by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam


Democrats too were outraged, arguing that programmes to improve nuclear weapons made their use more likely,
however they continued to assert that Iran's right to
"Peaceful Nukler power" should not be infringed.

Bbbbut if Iran continues to improve on it's nuclear weapon
wouldn't that mean it would be more likely to be used?


31 posted on 02/01/2005 6:11:06 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

How's it a warning when it will be years before they make these things if they make them at all?


32 posted on 02/01/2005 6:11:23 PM PST by ThermoNuclearWarrior (PRESSURE BUSH TO CLOSE THE BORDERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ThermoNuclearWarrior
How do you know we don't have them already? We played the same game with fuel-air explosives during Desert Storm.

We can be as deceptive as the Iranians.

33 posted on 02/01/2005 6:14:41 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Publius
If we already have them then why would they leak something like this? The leak only shows that Rumsfeld is interested in pushing ahead with this program.
34 posted on 02/01/2005 6:18:34 PM PST by ThermoNuclearWarrior (PRESSURE BUSH TO CLOSE THE BORDERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Refresh my memory. Who are you referring to?


35 posted on 02/01/2005 6:20:30 PM PST by fiftymegaton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: drt1

Disagree completely....first the VP's comment on the Imuys show..now this...Cheney and Rummy ain't stupid..this is NO leak this is all a deliberate psywar ops aimed at the mullahs in Tehran..


36 posted on 02/01/2005 6:20:32 PM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam

Hey Limey tabloid: You all better start hunting an ISREAL leaky memo cause thats where your doom will issue.


37 posted on 02/01/2005 6:20:46 PM PST by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

I'm with you. We are laying down the law to the Mullahs..


38 posted on 02/01/2005 6:24:09 PM PST by lavrenti (Think of who is pithy, yet so attractive to women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ThermoNuclearWarrior
Before Desert Storm:

"We think Saddam has fuel-air explosives in his arsenal, and we had better be prepared to develop them ourselves!"

During Desert Storm:

"Achmed, what is that smell? Gasoline? Why would the Americans be spraying gasoline all around us?
(KABOO-OO-OO-OO-MMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

39 posted on 02/01/2005 6:26:35 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: fiftymegaton
Somewhere Al Gore, fan of the relentless "risky scheme" charge, is smiling. ...
40 posted on 02/01/2005 6:27:24 PM PST by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve to keep us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson