Posted on 02/01/2005 1:55:34 PM PST by 68skylark
remember the film "The big carnaval"?
I mean, Mr. Ross has requested that the execution not be stayed. There is nothing in place that would cause his case to be appealed or re-opened. Neither the families of the eictims, nor the perpetrator are seeking to avoid the death penalty....
Calling Dr. Kevorkian!
There you go again -- trying to apply common sense. That doesn't work when lib judges and lib activists get involved.
No, I didn't see that one. Should I have seen that one?
Oh, but it's a terrible shame that someone who brutally cut down 8 innocent people should want to take his own life now, isn't it? I say we shouldn't punish murderers at all - it may sap their will to live.
Very nearly like a Catch-22 situation, but really only half of a Catch-22. We've sentenced you to death, but if you want to die then you're not competent to be put to death.
I say "nearly" a Catch-22 because once the liberals declare him not fit to die they won't change their minds if the murderer decides again that he wants to live.
So can I coin a new phrase for the lexicon? A "Catch-11", defined as one half of a Catch-22.
Excellent.
On the other hand, there are innocent people on death row also. (For example, these hapless kids: www.wm3.org.) That's a different problem.
Timothy McVeigh largely decided to give up his appeals for similar reasons. It sounds perfectly rational to me. In fact Ross sounds more rational than most liberals and many judges.
Yeah, I'm glad a murderer has to live in these conditions -- what's not to like? It's better than the conditions of his victims.
Do the humane thing send this PoS off.
They are not innocent kids. You obviously know nothing about these 3 "innocent" kids.
Aww, and a death sentence is supposed to be fun and games leading to a happy existence.
Bring back public hangings and put it on TV
Well the evidence I've seen says they're probably innocent. If you have a different perspective I can understand that, I guess, and I'm sure I won't change your mind.
This execution was stopped by KLINTOON-APPOINTED His Dis-honorable Judge Chatigny!! Anybody surprised??
Ultra-liberal Chatigny once ruled that publicly naming sex offenders was unconstitutional. Guess what? THAT WAS OVERTURNED BY THE US SUPREME COURT!
The US Supreme Court TWICE vacated stays to allow the execution of Michael Ross to be carried out. Guess what? Chatigny then threatened to pull the law license of the lawyer if other evidence were to surface after the execution. HE THUS INTIMIDATED AND BULLIED THE LAWYER TO POSTPONE THE EXECUTION!
Michael Ross RAPED AND MURDERED 8 FEMALES - 2 WERE 14 YEARS OLD! Why is the ULTRA-LIBERAL CHATIGNY so concerned with this admitted serial rapist and killer?
I DON'T CARE IF HE IS SANE OR INSANE - I DON'T CARE. BOTTOM LINE IS HE KILLED 8 FEMALES AND JUSTICE IS LONG OVERDUE!
I long to live in a RED STATE ...........
So, it is "cruel and unusual punishment" to take decades, even years, to execute convicted murderers? It is an easy problem to solve. Just bypass death row altogether. Take convicted murderers, to be executed, straight from the courtroom to the execution chamber, and execute them. It is so much more humane.
I'm a death penalty supporter, but it's a very imperfect solution. (Concealed carry is one good, partial solution -- it's a good idea if good people can defend themselves from predators, and maybe deter a few crimes in the process.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.