Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gieriscm; John O
I think the Methodist church (and the Episcopal, for that matter) hold the deed to the property in trust for the congregation. In most cases, from what I understand, the land & buildings are purchased and built by the larger church diocese (synod?) for the congregation, so in a sense this arrangement makes sense.

A much more important question for we Virginian Methodists is how we keep promoting these secularists to extremely high positions in the church? I'm an ex-Methodist as a direct result of the vast drift to the socialist left that the church as a whole has taken. I sure wish someone'd lead the Methodist church back to God's teachings...

6 posted on 02/01/2005 1:22:56 PM PST by detsaoT (insert hot-button issue here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: detsaoT

The local members buy and build and maintain, with some occassional support from conference funds. In any event, the property might be 100+ years old and purchased by members long-dead.

In a practical sense, the property comes from the blood, sweat, toil, and money of the locals.



9 posted on 02/01/2005 1:29:10 PM PST by mbarker12474 (United Methodist Church: Empty Your Wallets. Empty Your Minds. Last One Out Close the Doors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: detsaoT

Actually, Episcopal churches are built and paid for by the local congregation. In many cases, the facilities were well established long before the time the "money grab" trust clauses were added.


16 posted on 02/01/2005 1:53:16 PM PST by TaxRelief (Support the Troops Rally, Fayetteville, NC -- March 19, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson