Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phantom Lord

It wasn't "banned" per se, it just was never approved for broadcast by the federal regulator, due to our antiquated and parochial Canuck Content laws. "Banned" implies something more sinister, but of course many of our numerous leftists would liked it banned in the classic sense.

All this being said, it has recently been approved for inclusion in digital channel line ups. I picked up my digital cable box last weekend, and now I have Fox News. It is an unbelievable breath of fresh air, and other than sports in High Definition, nothing else has been on my TV since.


20 posted on 02/01/2005 1:02:10 PM PST by mitchbert (Facts Are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: mitchbert

It may be a very fine semantic point, but if it is illegal to carry a channel, it is safe to say that channel has been banned.


23 posted on 02/01/2005 1:04:52 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: mitchbert

I don't know about that. Fox News put in numerous applications to the CRTC that were all denied, I would call that banned.


27 posted on 02/01/2005 1:07:54 PM PST by UpHereEh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: mitchbert

Not Approved = banned. QED.


38 posted on 02/01/2005 1:52:39 PM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson