[negril]

I despise all things liberal, but I couldn't agree more with this article's take on BOR's blustering propensity to "exaggerate". He's blowhard and certainly not a conservative. I long for day he's removed and replaced. Ann Coulter anyone?

[UpHereEh]

Yeah but for them to distort the facts is propaganda. This is a story, not an editorial.

[Borges]

He doesn't claim to be a conservative and is very entertaining.

[RaginRak]

BOR called Ann Coulter a reactionary the other day on his radio show

[T.L.Sink]

I agree and O'Reilly is the prototypical blowhard. He
patronizingly and condescendingly refers to his audience
as "the folks" ,i.e., the poor dumb slobs that depend on
his courageous and relentless presentation to them of the
truth. Look at his phony e-mails: One says "You're a no
good right-wing extremist." And the next one he reads
says, "You're a no good left-wing extremist." Then Bill
smirks and assumes the contrived posture of the no-spin
moderate in the middle whose only interest is bringing
the truth to us stupid and helpless "folks." I've viewed
him less and less as time passes.

[Thommas]

they claim they're not conservative, but "mainstream." Well, maybe. From the Ku Klux Klan's perspective.

I agree BOR exaggerates and is not conservative, but the liberal slant of this article is typically insane. Liberals worldwide like to denounce "conservatives" as Nazis and Klanners, but this propaganda fails to note that Nazis were extreme socialists and Klanners were (and in the case of Sen. Byrd still are) liberal/progressive Democrats.

Those who cannot fathom basic history make for inept and risible pundits.