Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Survey Finds Students Ignorant Of Basic First Amendment Rights
GOPUSA ^ | 2-1-05 | Jimmy Moore

Posted on 02/01/2005 10:35:15 AM PST by FlyLow

WASHINGTON (Talon News) -- In a new study of high school students ironically released the day after the historic democratic elections in Iraq, basic freedoms such as the freedom of speech and of the press found in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution were found to be unimportant to them.

Commissioned by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation and conducted last Spring by the University of Connecticut, the survey of 112,003 high school students, 327 principals, and 7,889 teachers from 544 public and private high schools found an ignorance concerning fundamental constitutional rights in the United States by the leaders of the next generation.

It is said to be the largest such study of its kind to be conducted and cost $1 million to conduct.

According to the survey, more than one-third of respondents believe newspapers need "government approval" of their stories before they can be published with only about half stating they believe in unfettered freedom of the press. Another 13 percent said they did not care.

When asked if they believe the press has "too much freedom," again one-third said it does and 37 percent said it has just the right amount. One out of ten respondents said it has too little.

Additionally, three out of four respondents said they believe flag burning is against the law. However, a 1989 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court found it to be protected free speech under the First Amendment.

(Excerpt) Read more at gopusa.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acedamialist; billofrights; constitionlist; govwatch; homeschoollist; students

1 posted on 02/01/2005 10:35:15 AM PST by FlyLow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FlyLow

Public High School students? Ignorant? I thought they knew it all, taught by other know-it-alls? Sheesh.


2 posted on 02/01/2005 10:37:03 AM PST by theDentist (Jerry Springer: PBS for White Trash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow

All the better to deny them those rights when the Dems are in charge. I think this may be the problem with most of the young skulls full of mush at DU. They have no idea what the Constitution says.


3 posted on 02/01/2005 10:41:20 AM PST by MKM1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: FlyLow

I bet not one is unaware of the phrase "separation of church and state", though.


5 posted on 02/01/2005 10:51:41 AM PST by thoughtomator (How do you say Berkeley California in Aramaic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow

Here's a question: what were the questions? I don't see them listed anywhere on the website or in this article. This makes extremely suspicious - I believe that many of these students are responding to the Old Media's clear biases.

Concerning leaking classified information, or troop movements, or damaging information which may get someone killed, a lot of us believe that the Old Media is in active partnership with the enemy to damage America. Is this what the survey approached? If so, why are they not releasing the questions of the survey?

Without access to the questions of the survey, the results make no sense. I refuse to pass judgement on these kids until I know what it was they were asked...


6 posted on 02/01/2005 10:57:18 AM PST by dandelion (http://thequestionfairy.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow

"Additionally, three out of four respondents said they believe flag burning is against the law. However, a 1989 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court found it to be protected free speech under the First Amendment."

Oddly, it is the progressive City of Boston that made the fine for beating the crap out of a flag burner a $1 fine.


7 posted on 02/01/2005 10:58:29 AM PST by PeterFinn (Why is it that people who know the least know it the loudest?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Hurricane

What a great country. The Hurricane has the freedom of speech to insult the freedom of speech clause in the Constitution.
It's not surprising students don't know their First Amendment rights. Their taught by liberals who disapprove of free speech, They like regulated speech. The libs hate the second, fourth and tenth amendments too.
When I worked as a reporter, I covered an illegal teachers' strike in Florence, N.J. I was talking to students on the public sidewalk in front of the school when the Principal came out and threatened the students for talking to a reporter and threatened to have me arrested for trespassing and for "talking to students under the age of 18 without their parents' permission. I asked her to call the police so we could get that part of her charges resolved. She didn't.
I told her it would be instructive for the students if she could tell us where in the NJ legal code or U.S. statutes that law appears.
Then, I asked the kids what they thought of government officials who cite non-existent laws to threaten them. She left but not before telling the kids that she had plenty of time to deal with them later.
That's your public-school civics education for you.


8 posted on 02/01/2005 10:59:11 AM PST by jjmcgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
They polled the students and teachers?

I wonder how the teachers did? Doesn't look like they broke that down for the survey.

9 posted on 02/01/2005 11:01:21 AM PST by mewzilla (Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
No surprise here. The majority of Americans including judges also don't know what is in the Constitution or any of the amendments. They also have no concept of the original intent of the documents. They rely on the MSM or a survey to tell them what the documents mean. If they read the documents and the original intent from the writings of the time they were ratified, we would not be discussing what the Second Amendment means now.
10 posted on 02/01/2005 11:04:53 AM PST by ORECON (Condi Rice/Ann Coulter - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Annie03; AntiBurr; Baby Bear; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; BroncosFan; Capitalism2003; dAnconia; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
12 posted on 02/01/2005 11:11:47 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Jacques Chirac and Kofi Annan, a pantomime horse in which both men are playing the rear end. M.Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ORECON

You got that right.

We just witnessed the congress, president and supreme court all endorse a bill that specifically limited free speech and provided for fines and jail time if a person dared exercise certain forms of political speech at certain times in an election cycle. We have witnessed several states pass "hate crime" laws that punish unpopular thoughts and the supreme court has upheld these laws.

High school students being ignorant of our rights is the least of our problems. A majority of our government is just as ignorant (or just don't care) of our constitution.


13 posted on 02/01/2005 11:30:59 AM PST by scory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dandelion

> what were the questions?

http://firstamendment.jideas.org/findings/findings.php

Both the survey question regarding government approval of news stories and the coverage of that question were faulty:

http://lonewacko.com/blog/archives/002617.html#002617


14 posted on 02/01/2005 12:28:36 PM PST by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

Thankee kindly and btw cool blog!


15 posted on 02/01/2005 1:50:05 PM PST by dandelion (http://thequestionfairy.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: scory
its even worse then that the supreme joke err umm court just ruled that no search is unreasonable as long as the cops find something illegal during the search. Unreasonable searches: Court sticks a nose in our business
16 posted on 02/02/2005 3:21:05 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Jacques Chirac and Kofi Annan, a pantomime horse in which both men are playing the rear end. M.Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
Survey Finds Students Ignorant Of Basic First Amendment Rights

Yeah, but I bet they all knew how to use a condom, the importance of Kwanza, how nice it is that billie has two daddies, know that they are all going to die from global warming ..........................

17 posted on 02/02/2005 3:27:29 AM PST by bad company (if guns cause crime, then keyboards cause spelling mistakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjmcgo
Correct. Students have no problem with restriction of speech on the MSM because they live with PC restrictions themselves. Students are punished for their free speech. Students see citizens punished for their crimes and held to higher standards for their reasons for committing the crime - Hate crimes. Folks are punished for their thoughts.

That's why students agree with restricting press speech - they are themselves controlled with respect to free speech. It is the natural order of their lives.

18 posted on 02/02/2005 9:51:11 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson