In the article itself... 9,000 people a year die from it, and because of that they want to screen 14 million? The chances of having this problem are 0.064%, or over 1 in 1555, and that's just of the narrow target range of specific individuals most likely to be affected. To recommend 14 million scans (and presumably another 2 million a year or so as new men reach that age) for such an unlikely probability, does not logically follow, unless there is a financial benefit for one party or another in having so many scans done.