To: Destro; jb6; A. Pole; familyop; DarkWaters; Askel5; Tailgunner Joe; blackminorcapullets; ...
Destro wrote: "Putin did less and is cursed more."
I say more power to the KING!!! He's locked in a life and death struggle with Maoist/Communist insurgency, no doubt sponsored by Red China. Besides, as far as I can tell, His Majesty has the right to disband the Deuba government under the Nepalese constitution. Putin, the KGB-president, gives aid and comfort to Communists the world over. The King of Nepal fights them. Big difference. For this, and other reasons, the King of Nepal gets my vote.
To: TapTheSource
MAOISTS - Chinese origins - Cold War ally of America.
Putin - fights Jihadi Islamists and eneacted less restrictive policies than the UNELECTED Nepalese King did to protect his nation from a guerilla terrorist threat.
So you show your retarded bias clearly. I support both the Nepalese King and Putin - though I wish they did not have to resrt to such measures.
52 posted on
02/01/2005 8:42:36 AM PST by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: TapTheSource
"Destro wrote: "Putin did less and is cursed more." I say more power to the KING!!! "
But both Putin (who is not a king) and Russian apologists (on FR and outside of it) lay claim to more exalted status, too - namely, to Russia being an important and significantly civilized place. Thus it is only fair to adjust the judgment to the claims. If it were a small and insignificant principality of Muscovy, then there surely would not be much (if any) cursing. How much cursing, after all, is engendered by the governmental practices of Central Asia "-stans"?
56 posted on
02/01/2005 9:30:51 AM PST by
GSlob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson