[TapTheSource]

Destro wrote: "Putin did less and is cursed more."

I say more power to the KING!!! He's locked in a life and death struggle with Maoist/Communist insurgency, no doubt sponsored by Red China. Besides, as far as I can tell, His Majesty has the right to disband the Deuba government under the Nepalese constitution. Putin, the KGB-president, gives aid and comfort to Communists the world over. The King of Nepal fights them. Big difference. For this, and other reasons, the King of Nepal gets my vote.

[Destro]

MAOISTS - Chinese origins - Cold War ally of America.

Putin - fights Jihadi Islamists and eneacted less restrictive policies than the UNELECTED Nepalese King did to protect his nation from a guerilla terrorist threat.

So you show your retarded bias clearly. I support both the Nepalese King and Putin - though I wish they did not have to resrt to such measures.

[GSlob]

"Destro wrote: "Putin did less and is cursed more." I say more power to the KING!!! "
But both Putin (who is not a king) and Russian apologists (on FR and outside of it) lay claim to more exalted status, too - namely, to Russia being an important and significantly civilized place. Thus it is only fair to adjust the judgment to the claims. If it were a small and insignificant principality of Muscovy, then there surely would not be much (if any) cursing. How much cursing, after all, is engendered by the governmental practices of Central Asia "-stans"?