Congratulations to the BlogsforTerri Swarm! (http://http://www.blogsforterri.com/)
Last night we added our 100th member blog and are still growing fast.
Having met the milestone we have launched BlogsforTerri (http://http://www.blogsforterri.com/) as a central point for future information and to promote and network with TERRI's Team of 100 Bloggers.
Most of my blogging related to Terri will be done at the new site along with Richard from Hyscience and Beth from MyVastRightWingConspiracy.
Are you committed to blogging regularly in support of Terri? Then join us in our fight for justice by adding your blog to the BlogsforTerri blogroll. [http://www.blogsforterri.com/join.php]
Most of our members publish the BlogsforTerri blogroll on their site by placing the following code among their links:
(Go to this link http://www.prolifeblogs.com and the script is in a window on this particular blog)
In addition, hundreds of posts supporting Terri Schiavo and the Schindler family have been aggregated here and are updated several times per hour. If you haven’t added your site to the ProLifeBlogs.com aggregator please do it today by clicking here.
| Who do you believe? Suppose a person claims to have a Rembrandt painting. A published snapshot of the painting reveals that it looks amazingly like an iMac®, complete with the Apple® logo. Three experts hired by the person claim the painting is genuine; two other experts not hired by the owner claim it is fake, as do a dozen other experts who have not examined the painting but have seen the photo. Whose judgement of the painting's veracity should be considered more credible--the majority of those who examined the painting itself (who, by a 3-2 margin, claim it genuine), or those who merely saw the photograph (and who say that the photograph, while blurry, is sufficient to show that the painting is clearly a fake). A photograph of a painting can never provide sufficient evidence to prove its veracity, but can provide plenty of evidence to prove its falsehood. Michael Schiavo claims that his doctors provide clear and unambiguous evidence that his wife is in a permanent vegetative state. He claims that other doctors who merely examined video of Terri (he's only allowed two doctors not hired by him to examine Terri personally) are in no position to accurately diagnose her. If, however, the video clearly shows behavior which is inconsistent with Florida's definition of "persistent vegetative state", which is more credible: the doctors who say that, or the doctors who pretend the videos don't show what they clearly do? |