Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Churchill's statement ("clarifying" his remaks about 9/11 victims)
Rocky Mountain News ^ | 1/31/05 | Ward Churchill

Posted on 01/31/2005 6:29:25 PM PST by freespirited

The following is a statement from Ward Churchill:

In the last few days there has been widespread and grossly inaccurate media coverage concerning my analysis of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, coverage that has resulted in defamation of my character and threats against my life. What I actually said has been lost, indeed turned into the opposite of itself, and I hope the following facts will be reported at least to the same extent that the fabrications have been.

* The piece circulating on the internet was developed into a book, On the Justice of Roosting Chickens. Most of the book is a detailed chronology of U.S. military interventions since 1776 and U.S. violations of international law since World War II. My point is that we cannot allow the U.S. government, acting in our name, to engage in massive violations of international law and fundamental human rights and not expect to reap the consequences.

* I am not a "defender"of the September 11 attacks, but simply pointing out that if U.S. foreign policy results in massive death and destruction abroad, we cannot feign innocence when some of that destruction is returned. I have never said that people "should" engage in armed attacks on the United States, but that such attacks are a natural and unavoidable consequence of unlawful U.S. policy. As Martin Luther King, quoting Robert F. Kennedy, said, "Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable."

* This is not to say that I advocate violence; as a U.S. soldier in Vietnam I witnessed and participated in more violence than I ever wish to see. What I am saying is that if we want an end to violence, especially that perpetrated against civilians, we must take the responsibility for halting the slaughter perpetrated by the United States around the world. My feelings are reflected in Dr. King's April 1967 Riverside speech, where, when asked about the wave of urban rebellions in U.S. cities, he said, "I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed . . . without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today — my own government."

* In 1996 Madeleine Albright, then Ambassador to the UN and soon to be U.S. Secretary of State, did not dispute that 500,000 Iraqi children had died as a result of economic sanctions, but stated on national television that "we" had decided it was "worth the cost." I mourn the victims of the September 11 attacks, just as I mourn the deaths of those Iraqi children, the more than 3 million people killed in the war in Indochina, those who died in the U.S. invasions of Grenada, Panama and elsewhere in Central America, the victims of the transatlantic slave trade, and the indigenous peoples still subjected to genocidal policies. If we respond with callous disregard to the deaths of others, we can only expect equal callousness to American deaths.

* Finally, I have never characterized all the September 11 victims as "Nazis." What I said was that the "technocrats of empire" working in the World Trade Center were the equivalent of "little Eichmanns." Adolf Eichmann was not charged with direct killing but with ensuring the smooth running of the infrastructure that enabled the Nazi genocide. Similarly, German industrialists were legitimately targeted by the Allies.

* It is not disputed that the Pentagon was a military target, or that a CIA office was situated in the World Trade Center. Following the logic by which U.S. Defense Department spokespersons have consistently sought to justify target selection in places like Baghdad, this placement of an element of the American "command and control infrastructure" in an ostensibly civilian facility converted the Trade Center itself into a "legitimate" target. Again following U.S. military doctrine, as announced in briefing after briefing, those who did not work for the CIA but were nonetheless killed in the attack amounted to no more than "collateral damage." If the U.S. public is prepared to accept these "standards" when the are routinely applied to other people, they should be not be surprised when the same standards are applied to them.

* It should be emphasized that I applied the "little Eichmanns" characterization only to those described as "technicians." Thus, it was obviously not directed to the children, janitors, food service workers, firemen and random passers-by killed in the 9-1-1 attack. According to Pentagon logic, were simply part of the collateral damage. Ugly? Yes. Hurtful? Yes. And that's my point. It's no less ugly, painful or dehumanizing a description when applied to Iraqis, Palestinians, or anyone else. If we ourselves do not want to be treated in this fashion, we must refuse to allow others to be similarly devalued and dehumanized in our name.

* The bottom line of my argument is that the best and perhaps only way to prevent 9-1-1-style attacks on the U.S. is for American citizens to compel their government to comply with the rule of law. The lesson of Nuremberg is that this is not only our right, but our obligation. To the extent we shirk this responsibility, we, like the "Good Germans" of the 1930s and '40s, are complicit in its actions and have no legitimate basis for complaint when we suffer the consequences. This, of course, includes me, personally, as well as my family, no less than anyone else.

* These points are clearly stated and documented in my book, On the Justice of Roosting Chickens, which recently won Honorary Mention for the Gustavus Myer Human Rights Award. for best writing on human rights. Some people will, of course, disagree with my analysis, but it presents questions that must be addressed in academic and public debate if we are to find a real solution to the violence that pervades today's world. The gross distortions of what I actually said can only be viewed as an attempt to distract the public from the real issues at hand and to further stifle freedom of speech and academic debate in this country.

Ward Churchill Boulder, Colorado January 31, 2005


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: 911; academia; leftwingwackos; revisionisthistory; ucolorado; wardchurchill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
Revisionist history, pure and simple. He should either own his words and stand by them or admit how wrong he was and apologize. Blaming anyone but himself is absurd.
1 posted on 01/31/2005 6:29:25 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Liberals NEVER apologize.
He's just digging a deeper hole, which is fine with me. His words provided the noose from which to hang. The deeper the hole, the less chance his feet touch the ground. Ugly, Yes. Hurtful, Yes. SHOVE IT Churchill..


2 posted on 01/31/2005 6:32:06 PM PST by JesseJane (KERRY: I have had conversations with leaders, yes, recently.That's not your business, it's mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

So how were his previous statements distorted? This is even worse than what he was accused of saying in the first place.


3 posted on 01/31/2005 6:32:51 PM PST by thoughtomator (How do you say Berkeley California in Aramaic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Since he hates the U.S. so much perhaps we should deport him to Fallujah, just dump him on the street and see how much sympathy his views bring him.


4 posted on 01/31/2005 6:33:36 PM PST by 1LongTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
He has further clarified that he is a blithering idiot.

What I said was that the "technocrats of empire" working in the World Trade Center were the equivalent of "little Eichmanns." Adolf Eichmann was not charged with direct killing but with ensuring the smooth running of the infrastructure that enabled the Nazi genocide. Similarly, German industrialists were legitimately targeted by the Allies.

I get it. There is no confusion here.

5 posted on 01/31/2005 6:34:03 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
As Martin Luther King, quoting Robert F. Kennedy, said, "Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable."

That is so funny, I have never seen a quote attributed like that before in my life. This guy sounds like a wack job. He's trying to make excuses for himself and the excuses are not exceptable in my opinion.

6 posted on 01/31/2005 6:34:31 PM PST by MontanaBeth (NEVER FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
In 1996 Madeleine Albright, then Ambassador to the UN and soon to be U.S. Secretary of State, did not dispute that 500,000 Iraqi children had died as a result of economic sanctions, but stated on national television that "we" had decided it was "worth the cost."

That woman was just about the stupidest cabinet member in American history. I doubt whether even the administration of Ulysses S. Grant (a great general but a lousy president) could equal it.

I wonder whether Maddy has ever had a clue that the basic reason these children died was the Oil-for-Food program, which bill clinton helped Kofi and his pals set up.

Certainly Churchill has no excuse not to know what the true causes were, after all the recent publicity. After all, he claims to be an "expert" on these matters.

7 posted on 01/31/2005 6:34:50 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
this guy is !@$#% lying piece of !@$#% that needs to get the !@$#% out of our country if he !@$#% hates it so much

!@$#% him and the !@$#% propaganda machine he road in on
8 posted on 01/31/2005 6:34:57 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead (I believe in American Exceptionalism! Do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Is it okay if I simply want this ba$tard to DROP DEAD.

Feel free to delete this but I had to get it off my chest.

9 posted on 01/31/2005 6:35:29 PM PST by OldFriend (America's glory is not dominion, but liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Pardon my ignorance, but exactly who is Ward Churchill? Please tell me he's no relation to Winston.


10 posted on 01/31/2005 6:36:02 PM PST by deaconjim (Freep the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

He's still a jerk.

Saddam and only Saddam is totally responsible for any and all deaths that occurred during the sanctions. Period.


11 posted on 01/31/2005 6:36:06 PM PST by Felis_irritable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
" These points are clearly stated and documented in my book, On the Justice of Roosting Chickens, which recently won Honorary Mention for the Gustavus Myer Human Rights Award. for best writing on human rights."


LOOK AT HOW IMPORTANT I AM!!!!!!!!!!!

And Jimmy Carter won a Nobel peace prize for helping to make North Korea a nuclear power.
12 posted on 01/31/2005 6:37:09 PM PST by cripplecreek (they call me tater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Well, I feel so much better now.

Too bad he can't take responsibility for what he said. This clarification is worse than what was previously reported on.


13 posted on 01/31/2005 6:38:05 PM PST by highlandbreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
It's a shame he was threatened. No one should be threatened.



Never threaten someone like him. Nope.
14 posted on 01/31/2005 6:38:12 PM PST by Gorzaloon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Typical polyanna libefral pap. He really should just leave this country or watch his backside!


15 posted on 01/31/2005 6:38:53 PM PST by lawdude (Leftists see what they believe. Conservatives believe what they see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

It is the policy of those of the left to blame anyone other than themselves as they are never wrong...


16 posted on 01/31/2005 6:38:56 PM PST by GW and Twins Pawpaw (Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

"In 1996 Madeleine Albright, then Ambassador to the UN and soon to be U.S. Secretary of State, did not dispute that 500,000 Iraqi children had died as a result of economic sanctions, but stated on national television that "we" had decided it was "worth the cost.""



As if we didn't already know this, Albright is as much of an imbecile as this Churchill freak. Even if we stipulate that 500,000 Iraqi children died of disease or hunger during the time in which economic sanctions against Iraq were in place (the same sanctions that lefties later claimed were so successful as to make it unnecessary to remove Saddam from power), those children died because Saddam didn't spend a dime on his people's health and wellbeing and used all of Iraq's resources on weapons and the like. Leftists like this Churchill joker would have us send more hard currency to Saddam so that he could develop more weapons, since leftists figured that some of that money would "trickle down" (to coin a phrase) to poor Iraqis (ironically, when the rising tide of supply-side economics lifted all boats during the Reagan presidency, these leftists refused to see what was as plain as the nose on their faces).


17 posted on 01/31/2005 6:39:44 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
Similarly, German industrialists were legitimately targeted by the Allies.

Is that why there were so many of them left alive at the end of the war? I could find better two bit opinions in a bar than this so called"professor" has.

18 posted on 01/31/2005 6:40:23 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Don't get eliminated!" - MXC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Typical lib sh1t. Everything was taken out of context, I was misquoted, that wasn't what I meant.....the whole 9 yards here.

Just like with everything from "Bush's 16 words" to the "Yellow Cake" fiasco. They pick and choose which word combinations they want to use. Never mind 150 words previous, or the 150 words after.......

They squeal like pigs when confronted with their errors. I love to see them dance like this..

19 posted on 01/31/2005 6:40:37 PM PST by ThreePuttinDude (Plumbers for Bush....We flushed the Johns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead

Before he leaves he should be properly 'questioned' to determine his true motives for leaving...


20 posted on 01/31/2005 6:40:59 PM PST by GW and Twins Pawpaw (Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson