Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ladtx

From what I understand, Splenda is a chemically-modified molecular form of sucrose (sugar). Basically, what occurs is that you start with regular sugar, and through a certain chemical process 3 hydroxyl groups (COOH's) are replaced by 3 chlorine atoms (Cl's). Th resultant molecule is very much like 'natural' sugar in structure, but much less 'absorbable' in the body.

I use it, I like it. My educational background contains a good deal of organic chemistry. It's only my opinion, but I think it is the best sugar-substitute I know of out there.

My $0.02.........


10 posted on 01/31/2005 8:30:41 AM PST by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nesnah
What about Stevia? My diabetic wife uses it rather than Splenda, Aspartame, and Saccharin. She can only find it in a health foods store because it's sold as an herbal supplement rather than as a food item (sweetener). We've also grown Stevia. It's suppose to be 10x sweeter than sugar. From what we've read, the big 3 artificial sweetener manufacturers have successfully lobbied to keep Stevia from being listed as a food (out of fear of losing market share), but I've not done definitive research to prove that.
40 posted on 01/31/2005 9:15:55 AM PST by OB1kNOb (Imagine if there were no hypothetical situations......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson