See post # 915 for the specific language from the bill. It would require that the 23% rate be printed on receipts even though the customer paid a 29.87% markup on his purchase.
Its a proposed bill. This wacky 'requirement' would not stand.
Welcome to the Wacky World of the FairTax. Question everything they say.
That's exactly what I'm doing here. -- I'm also questioning the Wacky World of those, like you, who over-zealously oppose the FairTax.
That's exactly what I'm doing here. -- I'm also questioning the Wacky World of those, like you, who over-zealously oppose the FairTax.More than anything I zealously oppose the FairTax supporters misleading people like they misled you.
Why do these threads degenerate into a 30% vs 23% argument? Can't we discuss the relative merits or downside of this proposal?