Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevkrom
You can't even answer a simple yes or no without spinning the answer. Let me rephrase the question: do you have any reference where Dr. Jorgensen provides any founding or reference that AFT's rate is too low?
No, just that one. Do you have any reference where Dr. Jorgenson provides any founding or reference that AFT's rate is just right? I really would love to see it.
505 posted on 01/31/2005 11:19:55 AM PST by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies ]


To: Your Nightmare
Do you have any reference where Dr. Jorgenson provides any founding or reference that AFT's rate is just right? I really would love to see it.

No, I don't, actually.

So, basically, we've got unfounded assertions either way. I guess we should just do the math ourselves. In the article I referred to a while ago, we have:

The math is 17.6% / .84 = 20.95%, call it 21%. That leaves the difference of 2% (a roughly 10% overage) to cover evasion, et. al.

532 posted on 01/31/2005 11:40:59 AM PST by kevkrom (If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson