35% more? Where did you get that number? If you haven't really studied it don't hang numbers on it.
>>35% more? Where did you get that number? If you haven't really studied it don't hang numbers on it.<<
I'm pulling it out of my hat, which is where ALL numbers on this come from. I was making the larger point that having more money because you didn't pay income taxes is not going to mean you have more money to buy goods that have that same tax added on when you buy things.
This whole argument, at this point, is an exercise in futility. The plan needs to have some flesh on it before we can even debate it's merits. And merits we argue now all depend on how the plan is proposed, which it hasn't been yet.
That is why I said in an earlier post that this whole thread is arguing the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin.