Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RockinRight

Exactly, the writer failed to remember that he wouldn't be paying $10k to the government every year in income tax. It makes that $6,000 tax on a car a bit easier to accept.


4 posted on 01/31/2005 7:16:22 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
It makes that $6,000 tax on a car a bit easier to accept.

And never mind that @ 25% of a price of a new car is imbedded taxes already. Which would disappear. And that if you buy a used car, you pay ZERO sales tax.

21 posted on 01/31/2005 7:24:17 AM PST by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
Yes, he is ignoring the fact that the NRST is meant to replace the income tax, and that he is already ponying up that 40%.

And then he turns around and brings up spending, which makes the point of the NRST right there. Spending will never go down as long as politicians can hide taxation by turning corporations into tax collectors.

37 posted on 01/31/2005 7:30:47 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson