Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobRoy
Heavily taxing the act of spending (and it would be heavy) would not exactly by an economic boost.

The boost comes from eliminating the cost of tax compliance at EVERY stage of production--and not only the cost of tax compliance is eliminated, but the gigantic, politicized, greedy, unwieldy, pork-stuffed, unreadable current tax code is ALSO gone! Gone are the costs of hiring tax attorneys to lobby for miniscule reductions in industry-specific taxes that strangle production! Gone are the costs of thousands of federal tax offices, machinery, employees, supervisors, computers, telephones, papers, mailing costs, specialists--GONE! The savings to government would be in the many billions of dollars--any idea what tax compliance costs YOU, costs business, costs the government, costs the economy? GONE!

218 posted on 01/31/2005 8:42:42 AM PST by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: Judith Anne

If it was a simple sales tax (and that would be the only way it would be better) then it would mean a major shift in our economy away from an army of accountants and attorneys that would suddenly find their livelyhood vanished in a puff of smoke.

Substantial, sudden change like that is NEVER good for an economy.

NEVER!


272 posted on 01/31/2005 9:02:10 AM PST by RobRoy (I like you. You remind me of myself when I was young and stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson