Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eskywalter
Either one is preferrable to what is in place today.

AMEN!

I'm in the same boat as you, torn between the the 2 ideas.

177 posted on 01/31/2005 8:25:37 AM PST by Gabz (Anti-smoker gnatzies...small minds buzzing in your business..............SWAT'EM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
I'm in the same boat as you, torn between the the 2 ideas.

Some of the reasons I believe the FairTax is better than the Flat Tax:

1 - Under our current system, as well as under the Flat Tax, the taxes are levied at the production level, and increases the costs of our goods before they go to market. This happens throughout the entire production tree resulting in American made products having a cost burden of all the corporate, income, and SS taxes paid through production. This effectively puts a tax on our exports, and although it is not treated as an export tarrif (which are expressly forbidden by the Constitution) it accomplishes the same thing, and makes our own exports less competitive than if we taxed at the point of consumption rather than during production.

In fact, taxing income is WORSE than taxing exports, because it not only accomplishes the same effective tarrif for exports, it effectivly puts that tarrif on ALL American made goods, even if sold domestically. Other countries (China being a big one) are able to insert their products in American markets without being burdened by Federal taxes. That is the exact oposite of protectionism. Both the current system and the Flat Tax are effectively protectionist measures for everyone else at America's expense. The FairTax shifts the point of collection from production to consumption. This allows our products to be exported without the burden of federal taxation (consistent with the Constitutional prohibition on export tarrifs). ALSO, it taxes imported goods at the same rate as domesticly produced goods.

2 - Because the FairTax is collected at the retail level instead of the production level, non-retail business will experience an immediate gain by eliminating their federal tax burden, which should have the effect of lowering costs throughout the entire economy.

3 - Forbes tried to sell America on the FlatTax in 2000 and arguably failed. The FairTax, is much more salable. It has been my experience that everyone, without exception, with whom I have discussed the FairTax face to face, were initially sceptical and offered objections, but were quickly and easily won over and persuaded to be stongly in favor of the FairTax... Even several liberal democrats. That is simply not going to happen with the FlatTax.

4 - The FairTax broadens the tax base relative to the Flat Tax. The FairTax would collect tax from foreign (legal or otherwise) visitor's consumption, who are imune from taxation now. Criminals and others who do not report thier income would be taxed on their consumption. This dynamic would shift some of the Federal tax burden off of American's an onto those who are benefitting from being here but not taxed under our current system or the FlatTax.

5 - The FlatTax leaves the system in place that began as a simple system, open to further manipulations that resulted in the mess we have now. The FairTax repeals large amounts of code, and seeks to repeal the 16th ammendment, making it once again, unconstitutional to have a Marxist income tax.

342 posted on 01/31/2005 9:39:17 AM PST by OHelix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson