Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wotan

You are right-that is the one and only big disadvantage. I would support a phase in of the NRST beside a phase out of the income tax but ONLY if a constitutional amendment was passed that said that after the year that was the last year of the phase-out that the income tax would be unlawful.


1,184 posted on 02/02/2005 12:25:06 PM PST by RockinRight (It's NOT too early to start talking about 2006...or 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1176 | View Replies ]


To: RockinRight; wotan

CG gave a very good response to this issue. There are many other good explanations on this thread as well. But the concept that you will lose 23% of your savings when the FairTax is implemented is based on a misunderstanding of the dynamics.the value if your savings under the FairTax is not likely going to be true. I think if you become more familiar with how the FairTax operates, and what it accomplishes, I think you will find that seniors with large after tax savings will fair better under the FairTax than under our current system.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1332583/replies?c=484


1,189 posted on 02/02/2005 12:35:27 PM PST by OHelix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson