I saw that. However he did concede when his error was pointed out. That alone should at least put him in a separate class than Lewislynn. I would give him the benefit of the doubt that it was just posted too quickly without thinking about it than intentionally deceptive.
I'm aware you can glean a lot of good info from YN's arguments, even if his constant criticism of the FairTax without making the case of why another plan is better does get tiresome.
I think that he jumped without thinking that his argument would be so blatantly wrong and conceded when everyone called him on it. His first reaction was to jump, not to think.
You may be right, but when someone loses credibility with me, it's takes a lot for me to ever trust them again. I will keep him and everything that he says at arm's length until he shows me something worth trusting.
Except that simply calling someone a liar doesn't make them wrong...I'll concede to being wrong when I've been proven wrong..not just accused of it, you moron.