[jonestown]

Tell that to the paulsen/nightmare group, who are still using its convolutions to argue against supporting the Fair Tax.

That's why I posted the link.

And that's why I then commented that we had already seen the link and:
-- "If you read the last hundred posts or so, you would discover that many of us here are discussing that "very open explanation", and rejecting it as overly convoluted BS."

They should read it and move on to something else.

Indeed they should.
But they won't, because they have a statist quo agenda.

[kevkrom]

a statist quo agenda

Freudian slip on the malapropism there?

[Your Nightmare]

They should read it and move on to something else.

Indeed they should. But they won't, because they have a statist quo agenda.

I'm a little confused. Weren't you the one who mistakenly thought the tax exclusive rate was 23% and wasn't I just correcting you? That was you, right?